Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Very similar in nature to my #51 for commitWithin.
Original comment by liam.obo...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2010 at 11:37
The client currently has an optimize parameter which is no longer valid - i
believe it did exactly what expungeDeletes does (a merging of segments). So
instead of creating a new parameter in front of timeout which would have broken
the signature for anyone using timeout, I'm replacing optimize with
expungeDeletes which i believe to be the proper name for it.
Original comment by donovan....@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2011 at 7:19
Committed changes in r58
Original comment by donovan....@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2011 at 7:29
Thanks! ^_^
Original comment by olivier....@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2011 at 7:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
olivier....@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2010 at 11:55Attachments: