Hi!
It is possible to use floating point numbers for order widths (as stated in
release notes for version 0.3).
Lets consider the input:
425
46.99 67
63.5 9
82.55 38
90.17 36
67.95 20
And run calculation with default settings. We got output:
# Solution Report #
Best integer obj. func. value = 27
Pattern count = 3: 90.17 x 4, 63.5 x 1,
Pattern count = 2: 82.55 x 5,
Pattern count = 1: 63.5 x 2, 46.99 x 6,
Pattern count = 1: 46.99 x 9,
Pattern count = 4: 90.17 x 3, 82.55 x 1, 67.95 x 1,
Pattern count = 2: 82.55 x 4, 46.99 x 2,
Pattern count = 12: 90.17 x 1, 82.55 x 1, 67.95 x 1, 46.99 x 4,
Pattern count = 2: 82.55 x 2, 67.95 x 2, 63.5 x 2,
The problem is with pattern "90.17 x 1, 82.55 x 1, 67.95 x 1, 46.99 x 4".
It exceedes the maximum width (pattern width=428,63; max width=425).
The same problem is with last pattern - its width is 428.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by jiri.dol...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2013 at 8:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jiri.dol...@gmail.com
on 4 Oct 2013 at 8:46