Upload feedback to review report

[JBodera]

Hi, So just to ensure that we do not forget, we need to respond to the feedback from the review report. Looking at the review report I have identified some topics to address in the feedback:

• Actions to be done in the short/medium term : new issues will be created for them:

  62 , #63 , #64 , #65 , #66 , #67 , #68 , #69

• 1.3 General Comments : In general terms, the alignment and integration of ExPaNDS [...] is very positive but might raise the attention to better distribute the resources of both projects, guarantee they both delivered what planned but perhaps saving resources thanks to coordination. I think that coordinating the execution of two projects with so many partners and research centres makes it if any more difficult and will not make us save resources
• 1.3 General Comments: Minor deviations have been noticed: underspend resources and minor deviations in the training expectations (WP8) that are still insufficient in the pan-learning.org platform . Maybe we want to talk about this.
• 1.4 Recommendations concerning... : some lessons learned could be applied or taking into account, for example, searching for new mechanisms to engage the community (the so-called “users”) [...] Better user involvement, through open educational resources, might be explored. I think this is very interesting and goes in the direction of what we want to do, so we should say so.
• 2.2 Are the objectives of the project... : _In this sense, PaNOSC consortium is asked to be permanent aware and adapt its objectives and methodologies to new EOSC or PAN community needs (e.g. The new strategy for EOSC https://www.eoscsecretariat.eu/sites/default/files/ open_consultation_booklet_sria-eosc20-july-2020.pdf where ExPaNDS and PaNOSC are working together https:// github.com/panosc-eu/panosc/issues/60). We should say that we have already provided SRIA feedback for example

[JBodera]

feedback uploaded