The review report in page 3 (section 1.3) reads:
- The table of critical implementation risks should be updated (cf. section 2.3).
Also in page 4 (section 2.3):
New risks are identified (all the COVID-related issues) although not stated in the “unforeseen risks” section. Some of the envisaged risks at DoA (proposal level) are not relevant anymore but are addressed correctly.
I think that we should have a GOOD LOOK at the risks and update them accordingly.
This would be work for each WP leader, we could also double check this with ExPaNDS as they should have similar risks
The review report in page 3 (section 1.3) reads: - The table of critical implementation risks should be updated (cf. section 2.3).
Also in page 4 (section 2.3): New risks are identified (all the COVID-related issues) although not stated in the “unforeseen risks” section. Some of the envisaged risks at DoA (proposal level) are not relevant anymore but are addressed correctly.
I think that we should have a GOOD LOOK at the risks and update them accordingly. This would be work for each WP leader, we could also double check this with ExPaNDS as they should have similar risks