Open tetrapharmakon opened 1 year ago
This looks good, but I feel this is mixing concerns a bit.
Specifically, i feel that letting box
be a shortcut for specifying the number of anchors (see #2) has higher priority.
E.g. something like \node[box=0/1/0/2] (f) {f};
would give us f.east.1
, f.west.1
and f.west.2
(and no other anchors).
Also, \node[box, fill=green] (d) {d};
feels somewhat clearer? 🤔
Lemme implement #2 and let's talk about this after that, ok?
usage:
\node [box=green!20] (d) {d};
(fills the box withgreen!20
)VS
\node [box] (d) {d};
(fills the box white)