First of all, thank you so much for the good work that has been consistently referenced over the years.
I have a question about limitation for representation space in your code.
In paper, you guys said
Finally, we can define the set D as that where the above Gram-Schmidt-like process does not map back to SO(n): specifically, this is where the dimension of the span of the n−1 vectors input to gGS is less than n − 1.
However, there is no code(here and here) that enforces linear independence of the two 3D vectors.
Was it intentionally omitted for convenience? Any good way to force it?
First of all, thank you so much for the good work that has been consistently referenced over the years. I have a question about limitation for representation space in your code.
In paper, you guys said
However, there is no code(here and here) that enforces linear independence of the two 3D vectors.
Was it intentionally omitted for convenience? Any good way to force it?
Thanks.