Complete UX rubric

[scallsen]

DESIGN & RESEARCH COMPONENT

	0 points	1 points	2 points	3 points
Utilization of Github tools each week	Did not use Github tools	Sometimes used Github tools	Used Github tools every week somewhat correctly for most tasks	Used Github tools every week correctly for all tasks
Target Audience	There was no defined target audience defined	The target audience defined somewhat matched the product's goals	The target audience mostly matched the product's goals	The target audience correctly matches the product's goals
Competitive Analysis	No research was done for competitors	Very little research was done for competitors	Some research was done, and some used in the conceptual development phase	Competitors were researched and considered in the conceptual development phase
North Star - End Goal	The end goal was not considered, and the application either solved another goal entirely or accomplished nothing at all.	The end product met a few of the goals defined in the development phase	The end product met most of the goals defined in the development phase	The end product met all the goals defined in the conceptual development phase
External Feedback	There was no user testing performed	1 or 2 external sources were interviewed/used in user testing	3 or 4 external sources were interviewed/used in user testing	At least 5 or more external sources were interviewed/used in user testing
Teamwork	What team?	Some teamwork happened but it fell apart after a short time.	Communication was something, work was performed ok together	Worked great together. Communicated often and made decisions together. Everyone took on the workload they were assigned.
Quality of wireframes	Wireframes were not present / such low quality they are unusable	Wireframes were rough and not useful for further development	Wireframes were mostly complete and somewhat organized; usable for further development	Wireframes are effective, clean, and communicate the website's goals.
Quality of prototype	Prototype is poorly executed and incomplete	Prototype is somewhat organized and complete	Prototype is mostly organized and complete	Prototype looks cohesive, organized, and includes enough detail

[scallsen]

Utilization of Github tools each week – 2.5 We used all the tools we needed, but some members may have incorrectly completed their portion, but later learned for the next time we completed it.

Target Audience – 3 Our target audience's needs - students looking to book a room - matches the goal of our web app. Confirmed after user testing.

Competitive Analysis – 3 We researched 9 competitors in our research (from different devices and specialties) and incorporated information from that in further stages of the UX design process.

North Star / End Goal – 3 Our app definitely meets the goals of the end user, even after user testing, the changes we have to make are layout based changes, not corrections to the core goal of the app

External Feedback – 3 We met with 5 different people and got them to test our app and provide feedback.

Teamwork – 3 We communicate mostly in class and assign tasks during this time. We talk on Slack when needed, Teri sends a weekly reminder to make sure we are on track.

Quality of wireframes – 2 Wireframes were pretty thorough but led to a bit of confusion and were missing how the screens linked.

Quality of prototype – 2 Through user testing, we found that we could have added more detail to our existing screens, and more screens overall to make it more clear as to what is needed.

[TeriDibbits]

Filled out UX rubric