Create the two rubrics

[scallsen]

https://learn-the-web.algonquindesign.ca/courses/web-dev-6/week-02/#success-criteria-definitions

[scallsen]

Google Sheets

[MJholland]

DESIGN & RESEARCH COMPONENT

	0 points	1 points	2 points	3 points
Utilization of Github tools each week	Did not use Github tools	Sometimes used Github tools	Used Github tools every week somewhat correctly for most tasks	Used Github tools every week correctly for all tasks
Target Audience	There was no defined target audience defined	The target audience defined somewhat matched the product's goals	The target audience mostly matched the product's goals	The target audience correctly matches the product's goals
Competitive Analysis	No research was done for competitors	Very little research was done for competitors	Some research was done, and some used in the conceptual development phase	Competitors were researched and considered in the conceptual development phase
North Star - End Goal	The end goal was not considered, and the application either solved another goal entirely or accomplished nothing at all.	The end product met a few of the goals defined in the development phase	The end product met most of the goals defined in the development phase	The end product met all the goals defined in the conceptual development phase
External Feedback	There was no user testing performed	1 or 2 external sources were interviewed/used in user testing	3 or 4 external sources were interviewed/used in user testing	At least 5 or more external sources were interviewed/used in user testing
Teamwork	What team?	Some teamwork happened but it fell apart after a short time.	Communication was something, work was performed ok together	Worked great together. Communicated often and made decisions together. Everyone took on the workload they were assigned.
Quality of wireframes	Wireframes were not present / such low quality they are unusable	Wireframes were rough and not useful for further development	Wireframes were mostly complete and somewhat organized; usable for further development	Wireframes are effective, clean, and communicate the website's goals.
Quality of prototype	Prototype is poorly executed and incomplete	Prototype is somewhat organized and complete	Prototype is mostly organized and complete	Prototype looks cohesive, organized, and includes enough detail

[MJholland]

DATA & CODING COMPONENT

	0 points	1 points	2 points	3 points
Accessibility	No one can use the site	Only accessible to a handful of special people	Accessible to most people	Anyone in the world can use the site
Responsiveness	Not responsive	Responsive on some screens	Responsive but there is some issues	Website is responsive and looks great on all screen sizes
Performance	Doesn't load or loads super slow	Loads slowly	Good loading time, but could be faster	Excellent loading time
Code Quality	Coded by someone in Kindergarten	Code quality of a first year student	Coded like a second year, close to perfect but still lacking	Semantically correct and fully incorporates best practices
Teamwork	What team?	Some teamwork happened but it fell apart after a short time.	Communication was something, work was performed ok together	Worked great together. Communicated often and made decisions together. Everyone took on the workload they were assigned.

[TeriDibbits]

Two rubrics were completed.