Closed plejik closed 1 year ago
JFYI: I have deploy full setup with contour ( and left my traefik ingress ) set parameters like that
deploy:
postgresql:
enable: true
contour:
enable: true
tls:
secretName: consoleparalus
filebeat:
enable: false
fluentbit:
enable: false
fqdn:
domain: example.com
contour:
envoy:
hostPorts:
http: 32080
https: 32443
service:
type: NodePort
ingress:
enabled: true
So now console move via console.example.com ( via traefik ) And user connect work via contour ( but via port 32443) and one automation problem left - it's how config was set up for paralus service, by default i could not override it ( so fix by hand ) but this provide option at least override it by contour values ( if exist )
@plejik hey thanks for raising a pr, can you provide your complete configuration that users both traefik and contour for our reference ?
Genarally not so much to add here, but anyway, install traefik with 80 ports, ( ssl for ui covered by cloudflare ). Add my fix to ports and specify this default values:
contour:
envoy:
hostPorts:
http: 32080
https: 32443
service:
type: NodePort
deploy:
contour:
enable: true
tls:
secretName: paralus-le
filebeat:
enable: false
fluentbit:
enable: false
postgresql:
enable: true
fqdn:
domain: pr.example.com
ingress:
enabled: true
So in this configuration it will work with nginx as well. There only could be question how it will work with let encrypt but unfortunately i do not check this scenario. So in this case setup pretty simple, UI covered but incluster ingress controller. Only problem that i do not resolve ( since it's work as is ) - it's duplicated vaule in ingress and httpproxy
NAME CLASS HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGE
console traefik console.pr.example.com 80 44d
ztka traefik *.core-connector.pr.example.com,*.user.pr.example.com 80 44d
And
NAME FQDN TLS SECRET STATUS STATUS DESCRIPTION
console console.pr.example.com paralus-le invalid At least one error present, see Errors for details
ztka-core-connector *.core-connector.pr.example.com valid Valid HTTPProxy
ztka-user *.user.pr.example.com valid Valid HTTPProxy
Maybe i will try handle it later on when have time back to this one :)
Verified PR. Also pushed some minor changes.
What does this PR change?
Add option to use user main ingress controller ( aka nginx or traefik ) but use contour as well but on diff port ( so you do not need to make own custom setup and rules, which will simplify any future chart upgrade )
Does the PR depend on any other PRs or Issues? If yes, please list them.
-
Checklist
I confirm, that I have...
CONTRIBUTING.md
CHANGELOG.md
helm-docs
to update docs for chart (if values.yaml file was changed)