Closed peterwht closed 1 year ago
@weezy20 It is much smaller compared to AssetDeposit
. However, I do not think they are equivalent. Creating a new fungible class (AssetDeposit
) should be much more expensive than what is required to simply maintain an account.
These configuration values come from Statemint: https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/blob/master/parachains/runtimes/assets/statemint/src/lib.rs#L234
Do you have a specific chain you pulled those values from?
@peterwht Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking in terms of storage costs but I believe it's best to let the users decide on the configuration of this value.
deposit()
to match with Statemintpallet-assets
parameters to use thedeposit
functionpallet-motion
'sSuperMajority
to at least 2/3CouncilInstance
->CouncilCollective
, andCouncilCollective
->Council
(we want the extrinisic name to simply becouncil
).spec_version
to 1000, and node version to current Polkadot branch (0.9.370
)parachains-common
DealWithFees
causing the fees to be moved to the collator selection staking pot (fees are no longer burned)