🧑‍💻 Wishlist: Developers

kianenigma commented 5 months ago

Counterpart of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3901

Tracking issues for features that make the life of developers of polkadot-sdk easier.

Post your opinion by commenting “I wish for <issue-url>” (where “<issue-url>” can be in any repository, not just this) and upvote existing ones by putting a 👍 or 👎 on them.

⚠️ Warning: the string in your comment must match the following:

re.compile(r"I wish for:? (https://github\.com/([a-zA-Z0-9_.-]+)/([a-zA-Z0-9_.-]+)/issues/(\d+))")

A single comment can contain multiple wishes.

Ranking

Feature Request	Summary	Votes	Status
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5	Vision for cleaner substrate-node's developer-facing interface	18	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/802	Add ARM binaries to releases	14	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/278	Vision: Redesign Event system	11	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4947	Remove sequential increment requirements for Child Bounties	10	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/328	Vision: Storage Deposits to be Ergonomic and Automatic	6	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3594	Subscribe-able runtime apis	6	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690	Estimate Fees for XCM	6	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4284	XCM: Remove `require_weight_at_most` from Transact	4	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3434	Better delivery fees: DepositFee	3	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/644	Improve XCM debuggability	3	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/486	Runtime API to execute XCM	3	✅Closed
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4079	[FRAME] Storage derive macro `#[frame_support::stored]`	3	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5298	`pallet-assets` sufficient assets ED should provide same benefits as DOT ED	3	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/133	Vision: Repository reorganization	2	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3581	[FRAME] Warn when using default `SubstrateWeights` in production	2	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1493	Draft benchmark sanity weight test	2	✅Closed
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3672	A time based scheduler	2	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/698	XCM weight meter	2	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1138	[FRAME] VersionedCall	2	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/349	Encode required origin for extrinsics in metadata	2	👾 Open
https://github.com/paseo-network/paseo-action-submission/issues/103	Poor DevEx	1	✅Closed
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/738	XCM executor should use transfer over withdraw/deposit	1	👾 Open
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/273	Improved transaction payment pallet	1	👾 Open

Last updated: 2024-09-08

kianenigma commented 5 months ago

I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5

kianenigma commented 5 months ago

I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/133

kianenigma commented 5 months ago

I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/328

kianenigma commented 5 months ago

I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3581

kianenigma commented 5 months ago

I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3594

kianenigma commented 5 months ago

I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1493

It will be super useful to make sure parachains don't go to production with bad/dummy weights.

acatangiu commented 5 months ago

I wish for: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690

Cross-consensus XCM asset transfers are complicated with currently no way to know/estimate required fees along the path to the final destination.

acatangiu commented 5 months ago

I wish for: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3434

XCM delivery fees are currently "magically" subtracted from Origins account outside of XCM execution. The XCM program currently has no control over these transport fees. #3434 attempts to improve/fix that.