Open kianenigma opened 3 months ago
This issue has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there:
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-digest-4-apr-2024/7234/1
This issue has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there:
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-summit-24-boosting-the-developer-experience/7202/5
I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3288 For pure proxies to be cross-chain
I wish for #547
ChaosDAO wishes for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4193
@Tbaut @Leemo94 @josepot can you please make sure you follow the pattern asked for in the issue:
“I wish for \<issue-url>”
I edited to start with this. However, as a human, I'd like to be able to understand what the issue is about without clicking on it (particularly on mobile with no hover preview). This would make for a much better UX going through and voting on these issues. Can we make the bot to recognize and take into account the patern "I wish for [issue-url]" but keep the whole thing human readable still?
This issue has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there:
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/ux-efforts-in-the-ecosystem/8469/1
Counterpart of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3900
Tracking issues for features that make the life of end-users of the Polkadot platform easier.
Post your opinion by commenting “I wish for
<issue-url>
” (where “<issue-url>
” can be in any repository, not just this) and upvote existing ones by putting a 👍 or 👎 on them.⚠️ Warning: the string in your comment must match the following:
A single comment can contain multiple wishes.
Any
Proxies Copyable from a Configured Source