Closed ggwpez closed 1 month ago
Turns out that @chevdor still owns prdoc
and prdoclib
at crates.io when I asked about it in DM, he refused to add parity account to owners:
I did consider the options for the prdoc publishing on crates.io and I think it would be best for parity to publish to a parity crate such as some
parity-prdoc
for instance.
I am not "in line" with some of the recent changes to the source and I want to keepprdoc
a generic tool as it was originally designed.
That will also give you/parity more freedom about regarding the next version and its features
I guess, we'll have to publish it as parity-prdoc
/ parity-prdoclib
Do we actually need a separate crate for prdoclib? Why not provide both bin
and lib
from the same crate?
Yea, then we should possibly also rename the repo to parity-prdoc
to reflect this.
0.0.8 has not made it here yet: https://crates.io/crates/prdoc