Closed mutantcornholio closed 1 month ago
Release engineering can also publish it: https://crates.io/crates/prdoc
However, we can't use Parity's user to publish it.
As far as I understood it, I'd have to ask @Morganamilo or @EgorPopelyaev for their crates.io token to keep publishing it.
Just as well as Will can revoke the access at any time (which seems probable, as he refuses to cooperate), and we can't do anything about it.
I spoke to Will and confirmed that it is okay to remove Rel-Eng as publisher and that Parity should fork.
Then please go ahead with renaming the crate and setting up the publish pipeline again with the new name: parity-prdoc
.
Maybe we also rename the repo here, not sure.
PS: We could keep the binary name backwards compatible, so that it installs two binaries: prdoc
and parity-prdoc
. Then it would not break workflows.
PS: We could keep the binary name backwards compatible, so that it installs two binaries:
prdoc
andparity-prdoc
. Then it would not break workflows.
Why not just keep producing a single prdoc
binary?
Two identical binaries seems a bit weird and excessive.
Maybe we also rename the repo here, not sure.
I think maybe just mention it in README and that's all? paritytech/prdoc
still has "parity" in the name.
@chevdor still owns the package on crates.io, and refuses to allow parity to publish it
And maybe instead of two crates, we only need one?
WDYT?
Fixes #36