Open kraymond37 opened 2 years ago
AFAIK we use bip39.
I can confirm this is from the use of the --scheme Ecdsa
, without the flag a key is generated as expected. Unless I am missing why the derivation should not be available in using ECDSA.
Our reference for BIP39: https://github.com/paritytech/substrate-bip39
This is a crate for deriving secret keys for Ristretto compressed Ed25519 (should be compatible with Ed25519 at this time) from BIP39 phrases. ... Since we are breaking compatibility with both BIP32 and BIP44 anyway (which we are free to do as we are no longer using the Secp256k1 curve), there is also no reason why we should adhere to BIP39 seed generation from the mnemonic.
@NukeManDan why is that a bug?
Unless I am missing why the derivation should not be available in using ECDSA.
I guess whatever tag is correct, please update as you see fit - this was my best guess. 😅
I try to inspect bip44 path, but failed.
It seems polkadot seed is not the same as bitcoin. Is there detail explaination about address generating?