Open JoshOrndorff opened 11 months ago
Hi @JoshOrndorff, wdyt of using this (parachain-name could not be set)
name
: <id>-[parachain-name]-<relaychain-name>
id
: <id>_testent
Thx!
That's fine with me. Any reason not to do protocolId
as well?
That's fine with me. Any reason not to do
protocolId
as well?
No particular reason, we can also put the para_id
, wdyt? Or maybe allow to set from the config, in a new field for the parachain.
Currently Zombienet does not customize the
name
,id
, orprotocolId
for the parachains that it launches. That means they all end up with the exact same defaults like "local testnet" and similar.In parachains based on the node template, zombienet does change the consensus authorities which manages to make the individual specs unique enough to not collide. But it is not guaranteed that all chains will use this configuration. Any chain that uses Nimbus, PoW, or Tuxedo, parachain_staking, etc, for example will not have the aura fields.
So I recommend also customizing the chain specs (both plain and raw) with meaningful names and ids. For example maybe they could be set to "2000-rococo-local-plain", "2001-rococo-local-plain", ..., "2000-rococo-local-raw", ...