Closed seabbs closed 2 years ago
After we chatted I think the decision is to explore
n = 10, 100, 200
for outbreak settings and n = 200
for fixed growth rate settings. Will make this update to the pipeline.
Sounds awesome. Thank you! Will do more work on this when I get home.
Running this now so should be updated tomorrow.
As you suggested I think the current maximum sample size we are investigating is perhaps a bit large given the runtime issues. If we instead drop down to explore
n = 10, 100, 200, 400
we have more head room for looking at replicates etc which seems like it will be more useful. As long we discuss the scaling properties of each model (i.e across our explored samples) it feels like we can still make the same point as we would with a larger sample.