Closed anludke closed 3 months ago
@anludke Please provide a meaningful commit description to enable the review for this PR
I had a quick look at it but, due to the huge number of files and the fat that these are new examples added to the repo, instead of validating these changes on my repo I'd suggest to have a meeting where you can show live the workflow runtime. WDYT? FYI @masayag
@anludke @masayag @dmartinol have we had the meeting to talk about this PR? or is it ok to continue review?
@anludke @masayag @dmartinol have we had the meeting to talk about this PR? or is it ok to continue review?
It's fine for me even with no meeting, but I'll leave the last word to @masayag
Add minor comments, other than that, LGTM.
another quick look. \lgtm but I would add brief explanation of how these implementation are different. apart from that, well done
Brief explanation added to each implementation
This PR structures the assessment as a whole providing 3 different examples of implementing an assessment workflow using (1) jq expression, (2) custom code and (3) knative function to perform the assessment per se and then return infrastructure workflow options based on a simple use case. Indeed, the assessment here requires a user input as a string and checks if it it contains the keyword
dummy
in order to recommend the suitable infrastructure workflow options. The goal here is the provides different options to developers to start writing assessment workflows for the orchestrator.