Closed krestenkrab closed 11 years ago
Thank you for the comment (and the nice library). I agree that it's very nice syntax, I'll be looking around that (I should have checked the properex library before...).
It corresponds to [4dde1e5] at the moment, though it needs more improvement.
@yrashk has a very nice syntax, not quite unlike yours. I don't know if his stuff still compiles/works with current syntax, but I like it quite a bit more:
His test/example code is here: https://github.com/yrashk/properex/blob/master/test/proper_test.exs