Closed davidascher closed 6 years ago
Ok, couple questions before deciding how to proceed:
I don't have a great number, but you basically want people to find tags that fit their data "enough". So it depends on the total number of cases. I'd say 100 is fine for now
not at this point (localization issues, etc. -- we're asking them to ask us to add tags, which we can do easily)
Yes, I think @dethe can easily do that. I can, a bit less easily =)
Quickie tag count, almost certainly has false positives (believe it or not that tag list has gone through at least a couple of levels of cleanup already).
Americans Elect: 1 Colton Schweitzer: 1 Tony Elia: 1 1St Amendment: 1 Agora Ekklesia: 2 Agriculture: 1 Anna-Lindh-Salin: 1 Argument Mapping: 1 Online Tools For Deliberation: 1 Participatory Democracy: 6 Wicked Problems: 1 Conflict Management: 1 Knowledge Presentation: 1 Australia: 8 Direct Democracy: 3 Autonomy: 1 Backbone Campaign: 1 Blasphemy Laws: 1 Bulgaria: 1 By The People: 1 BüRgerbeteiligung: 2 BüRgerhaushalt: 2 BüRgerrat: 1 Cbwm Community Based Waste Management: 1 Cdd: 1 Cir: 3 California Citizens Redistrciting Commission Proposition 11 Voters First Act Senate Assembly Board Of Equalization: 2 Canada: 1 Nuclear Fuel: 1 Nuclear Waste: 1 Citizen Deliberation: 4 Canadian: 1 Citizen Deliberation: 4 Citizen Participation: 9 Citizen Participation: 9 Participatory Budgeting: 58 Local Government: 7 Voluntary And Community Groups: 4 Citizen'S Dialogue: 0 Citizens Initiative Review: 1 Citizens For Democracy: 1 Citizens Manifesto: 1 Democracy: 44 Europe: 3 Alternatives: 1 Rights: 2 Vision: 1 Precarity: 1 Community Places: 1 Engagement: 32 Community Planning: 3 Communities: 1 Community Development: 2 Community And Voluntray Sector: 1 Community Planning Toolkit: 1 Community Planning: 3 Toolkit: 1 Engagement: 32 Outcomes: 1 Working Together: 1 Alignment: 1 Community-Based Participatory Research: 2 Consciousness-Raising: 1 Crowdmapping: 1 Crowdsourcing: 6 Crowdsourcing: 6 E-Democracy: 6 Dred: 2 Deliberative: 17 Deliberative Poll: 5 Delphi: 2 Democratic Experimentation: 3 Democratic Innovation: 2 Democratici Diretti: 1 Development: 14 Direct Democracy: 3 DiseñO Participativo: 1 Ebm: 1 Eu: 6 Economic Development: 4 Empowerment: 2 English: 1 Environment: 8 Equality: 4 Eskil Par: 1 Europe: 3 Facebook Application: 1 Finland: 2 Fishkin: 1 Freerz: 1 Freerz Community: 1 Freerz Manifesto: 1 Friesland: 1 Gamba: 1 Gm0: 1 Government: 13 Ict: 5 India Democratic Innovations Satyamev Jayate: 1 Indonesia: 1 Lore Lindu National Park: 1 Indonesien: 1 Inner Belt: 1 Highway: 1 Protest: 5 Boston: 1 Cambridge: 1 Massachusetts: 1 Institutional Reform: 1 International Development: 1 Ireland: 1 Irish Constitution Constitutional Convention Irish: 1 Italiano: 1 Kommunalebene: 1 KöNigslutter;Landschaftsplan;Kubicek;Lippa;Westholm;Politische PartißZipation: 1 Niedersachsen;Demokratie: 1 Latin America: 2 Liquid Democracy: 2 Liquid Feedback: 1 Living Democracy: 1 Local Governance: 1 Marginalization: 1 Melbourne: 1 Michigan: 1 Montevideo: 1 Latin America: 2 Decentralization: 1 Morocco: 1 Moveon Move On: 1 Ngo: 2 Nh Department Of Resources And Economic Development (Dred).: 1 Nh Listens: 2 Nh Listens Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan: 1 Nh Office Of Energy And Planning (Oep): 1 Nepal: 1 New Hampshire: 2 New Hampshire Department Of Resources And Economic Development (Dred): 1 New Hampshire Office Of Energy And Planning (Oep): 1 Noosa: 1 Nordrhein-Westfalen: 1 UniversitäT: 1 Hochschule: 1 Memorandum: 1 Ministerium FüR Innovation: 1 Oep: 2 Occupy Vancouver: 1 Process: 2 Spokes Council: 1 Consensus: 4 Democracy: 44 Occupy Wall Street: 4 Occupy: 5 Movement: 4 Activism: 6 Social Justice: 2 Environmental Justice: 2 Economic Justice: 2 Revoution: 2 Inclusive: 4 Participatory: 74 Democracy: 44 Proces: 4 Love: 2 Oct 15: 1 Online Democracy: 3 Onlinepartizipation: 2 Open Policy Making: 1 Oregon Citizen'S Initiative Review: 0 Pbcensus 1 - Complete Raw Data: 3 Pbcensus 2 - Requires Phone Call: 3 Pbcensus 3 - Requires Significant Research: 2 Pakistan: 1 Participatory Grants-Making: 1 Participatory Planning: 1 Participatory Democracy: 6 Partizipation: 4 Pipeline: 1 Environment: 8 Community Advisory Boards: 1 Portugal: 1 Poverty: 2 Proxy Voting: 1 Queensland: 1 Radical Feminism: 1 Sdd: 1 Spd: 1 Shoreline Master Program Smp Sma Update: 1 Small Group-Facilitated Dialogue: 1 Social Media: 3 Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands: 1 Stadt KöLn: 1 Stadtplanung: 1 Stammtisch 2.0: 1 Stammtisch 3.0: 1 Statewide Convener: 1 Student Participant: 1 Studenten: 1 Studierendenzufriedenheit: 1 StudienqualitäT: 1 Study Circles: 1 Sulawesi: 1 Community Conservation Agreements: 1 Super Pac: 1 Protest: 5 Mockery: 1 Money: 1 Social Movement: 1 Internet: 3 Personality: 1 Us Politics: 1 Finance: 1 Corruption: 1 Youth: 11 Occupy Wall Street: 4 Sydney: 2 Teaching Tool Student Engagement: 2 Technology: 5 Textizen Philadelphia: 1 Sms Messages: 1 Phone: 4 Mobile Phone: 0 Cell Phone: 0 Cellular: 1 Participation: 32 Ubc Class 2015: 1 Uk: 3 Umbrella Group: 1 United Nations: 1 United States: 1 Venezuela: 1 Victoria: 2 Virtual Parliament: 1 Volksentscheid: 1 Vote: 4 Voters: 3 Voting: 2 Wwviews: 1 Wisdom Council: 1 Wissenschaft Und Forschung Des Landes Nordrheinwestfalen (Miwf): 1 You Choose Redbridge Budget Consultation Tool: 1 Young People: 2 Accessibility: 1 Active Citizens: 2 Activism: 6 Affordable Housing: 1 Agenda: 1 Agora 2.0: 1 Agricultural Development: 2 Airesis: 1 Alcohol: 1 Alternative Transportation Models: 1 Animal Protection: 2 Animal Welfare: 2 Anti-Social Behaviour: 1 Anticipatory Democracy: 1 Applied Innovation: 1 Archive: 2 Argument Map: 3 Arquitectura: 1 Art: 114 Arthritis: 1 Attention Ecology: 1 Australia: 8 Australia: 8 Participatory: 74 Budget: 65 Deliberation: 20 Awareness: 1 Beaches: 1 Big Data: 2 Bike Lane: 1 Bikeway: 1 Bilancio Partecipativo: 1 Budgeting: 59 Capacity Building: 2 Cats: 1 Change: 2 Changeagent: 1 Changeagents: 1 Childcare: 1 Children: 2 Citizen Panel: 3 Citizens: 22 Citizens Assembly: 2 Citizens Jury: 2 Citizens: 22 Assembly: 6 Citizens: 22 Councils: 3 Citizens: 22 Jury: 6 Citizenship: 3 City Planning: 1 Civic Education: 1 Civic Engagement: 8 Civic Engagement: 8 Digital Participation: 1 Planning: 13 Public: 18 Civic Interaction: 3 Civic Participation: 4 Civic Studies: 1 Civic Tech: 2 Civil Disobedience: 1 Civil Society Group: 1 Climate Change: 1 Co-Creation: 1 Co-Design: 2 Co-DiseñO: 1 Collaboration: 2 Collaborative Governance: 2 Collaborative Planning: 1 Collective Decision Making: 1 Common Ground Theory: 1 Communal Councils: 2 Community: 25 Community Development: 2 Community Engagement: 8 Community Engagements: 1 Community Planning: 3 Community-Academic Partnership: 1 Community-Engaged Scholarship: 1 Consensus Conference: 3 Conservation: 4 Conservation: 4 Habitats: 1 Endangered Species: 1 Threatened Species: 1 Hcps: 1 Constitutional Conventions: 1 Consultation: 7 Conversational Democracy: 1 Corporate Reform: 1 Corporate Social Responsibility: 1 Crime: 1 Critical Reporting: 1 Crowdsourced Deliberation System: 1 Culture: 3 Cycle Track: 1 Cycling: 2 Cycling Infrastructure: 1 David Mathews Center For Civic Live Engagement: 1 Deliberation: 20 Alabama: 1 Decision Making: 6 Decision Theory: 1 Deeper Democracy: 1 Deliberation: 20 Deliberative Democracy: 12 Deliberative Democracy: 12 Sustainability: 3 Collaborative Governance: 2 Deliberative Polling: 2 Deliberatorium: 2 Democracy: 44 Democracy System Market Direct Representative: 1 Democratic Accountability: 3 Democratic Reform: 1 Democrazia Partecipativa: 1 Demopart: 2 Desarrollo Social: 1 Design: 5 Deutsche Parteien: 1 Dialog: 12 Dialogue: 10 Digital Democracy: 1 Digital Engagement: 1 Digitalengagement: 1 Direct Representation: 1 Disaster Relief: 1 Discussion Board: 1 DiseñO Colaborativo: 2 DiseñO Social: 1 Dissent: 1 Dogs: 2 Doparie: 2 Driving: 1 Dynamic Faciliation: 1 Dynamic Governance: 1 E-Deliberation: 2 E-Democracy: 6 E-Government: 1 E-Participation: 2 EzüRich Epartizipation Ideenwettbewerb ZüRich Digitale Zukunft: 1 Easw: 1 Eco-System: 1 Economic Empowerment: 1 Ecosystem-Based Management: 2 Edem: 4 Edemocracy: 2 Education: 6 Efficiency Evaluation Participation: 1 Egovernment: 1 Election: 3 Elections: 1 Electoral District Forum: 1 Electoral Reform: 1 Energy: 3 England: 1 Enquiry By Design: 1 Eparticipation: 1 European Awarness Scenario Workshop: 1 Exhibition: 1 Experts: 1 Facilitation: 4 Facilities: 1 Feminism: 3 Film: 1 Focus Groups: 1 Food: 1 Forums: 1 Freedom Of Expression: 1 Freedom Of Speech: 2 Freight: 2 Galatina Città Fertile Politiche Giovanili Italian: 1 Gambling: 1 Gamification: 1 Gender Equality: 1 Gender Justice: 1 Global Warming: 1 Grassroots: 2 Grassroots Democracy: 1 Growth: 1 Haulage: 1 Health: 7 Health Care: 3 Healthy Eating: 1 History: 2 Human Needs: 1 Human Rights: 1 Icebreaker: 1 Idea Management: 1 Ideation: 2 Ideation Software: 2 Inclusive Decision Making: 2 India: 3 Indigenous Citizenship: 2 Industry: 1 Infrastructure: 6 International Education: 1 Internet: 3 Digital Divide: 1 Net Neutrality: 1 Internet: 3 Privacy: 2 Legal Affairs: 1 Interview: 1 Intra-Party Democracy: 1 Italy: 2 Journalism: 1 Land Use: 2 Landscape: 1 Large Scale Consultations: 1 Law Amending: 1 Law-Making: 2 Lawmaking: 3 Lay People: 1 Legal Information: 1 Legislative Information: 1 Local: 11 Local Economy: 1 Local Equality: 1 Local Government: 7 Local Self-Reliance: 1 Maps: 1 Marrickville: 1 Media: 4 Media Reform: 1 Mental Health: 1 Meta-Theory: 1 Monitoring: 4 Munich: 1 Municipal Politics: 1 Nanotechnology: 1 Natural Resource Management: 2 Neighborhood: 1 Neighbourhood: 2 Network: 3 New South Wales: 1 Night Life: 1 Night-Time Economy: 2 Nightlife: 1 Nonpartisian: 1 Nuclear: 2 Obesity: 1 Occupy Wall Street: 4 Occupy: 5 Movement: 4 Social Media: 3 Social Networking: 1 Facebook: 2 Twitter: 1 Youtube: 1 Livestream: 1 Online: 13 Online Deliberation: 3 Online Discussion: 2 Online Forum: 1 Open Calls: 1 Open Democracy: 1 Open Government: 3 Open Space Technology: 1 Opengov: 1 Oral Storytelling: 2 Organization: 2 Outdoor Space Organization: 1 Overweight: 1 Panels: 1 Parliament: 4 Parliament Monitoring: 1 Parliamentary Informatics: 2 Partecipazione: 1 ParticipacióN Ciudadana: 1 ParticipacióN Comunitaria: 1 Participation: 32 Participation: 32 Crowdsourcing: 6 Participatory Budget: 63 Participatory Budgeting: 58 Participatory Budgeting: 58 Seville: 1 Participatory Strategic Plan: 1 Participatory Democracy: 6 People Power: 1 Performance Monitoring: 2 Petition: 1 Pets: 2 Pirate Parties: 1 Planning: 13 Platform: 2 Polarizing: 1 Policy: 2 Policy Panel: 1 Political Accountability: 1 Political Parties: 1 Politics: 4 Poverty Alleviation: 1 Privacy: 2 Pro-Poor Solutions: 1 Procedural Competencies: 1 Processi Decisionali Inclusivi: 1 Project Cycle Management: 1 Protest: 5 Public Comment: 1 Public Consultation: 3 Public Conversation: 1 Public Education: 1 Public Engagement: 9 Public Participation: 4 Public Space: 1 Public Engagement: 9 Racial Equality: 1 Racial Justice: 1 Restorative Justice: 1 Policing: 1 Random Selection: 1 Student Governments: 1 Youth: 11 Rotation: 1 Recreation: 2 Regulation: 1 Renewal: 2 Representative: 3 Representative Democracy: 1 Research: 7 Residential Planning: 1 Resistance: 1 Responsabilità Sociale: 1 Revolution: 1 Right To Shelter: 1 Road Safety: 3 San Antonio: 1 Chile: 1 Presupuesto Participativo Ciudadanos Democracia Participativa: 1 Schools: 1 Science: 2 Science Public Engagement Participation: 1 Service-Learning: 1 Shipping: 1 Shop Local: 1 Slums: 1 Small Business: 1 Social Innovation: 3 Social Ventures: 1 Sociocracy: 1 Software: 3 South Australia: 1 Speed Dating: 1 Sports: 1 Stakeholder Engagement: 1 Strategic Planning: 1 Community Engagement: 8 Rural: 1 Australia: 8 Street Sharing: 1 Structured Dialogic Design: 1 Student-Led: 1 Sussidiarietà: 1 Sustainability: 3 Sustainable Mobility: 1 Sweden: 2 Taxi: 1 Teachers Training: 1 Theory On Procedures: 1 Time-Credits: 1 Toolbox: 1 Tourism: 2 Town Meeting: 2 Transgender Activism: 1 Transport: 6 Trauma: 1 Tribes: 1 Urban Development: 3 Urban Mobility: 1 Urban Politics: 1 Urban Renewal: 1 Urban Stream Restoration: 1 Urban Transportation: 2 Video: 2 Violence Against Women: 1 Voice: 1 Voter Free-Rider Problem: 1 Voter Information: 1 Waste Management: 2 Waste Valuation: 1 Watershed Governance: 1 Western Australia: 1 Wiki: 2 Wildlife Management: 1 Women-Friendly City: 1 Young People: 2 Community Participation: 1 Uk: 3 Youth: 11 Youth Development: 1 Youth Education: 2 Youth Engagement: 2 ÖFfentlichkeitsbeteiligung: 1
Sorted in order of decreasing frequency:
Art: 114
Participatory: 74
Budget: 65
Participatory Budget: 63
Budgeting: 59
Participatory Budgeting: 58
Democracy: 44
Engagement: 32
Participation: 32
Community: 25
Citizens: 22
Deliberation: 20
Public: 18
Deliberative: 17
Development: 14
Government: 13
Online: 13
Planning: 13
Deliberative Democracy: 12
Dialog: 12
Local: 11
Youth: 11
Dialogue: 10
Citizen Participation: 9
Public Engagement: 9
Australia: 8
Civic Engagement: 8
Community Engagement: 8
Environment: 8
Consultation: 7
Health: 7
Local Government: 7
Research: 7
Activism: 6
Assembly: 6
Crowdsourcing: 6
Decision Making: 6
E-Democracy: 6
Education: 6
Eu: 6
Infrastructure: 6
Jury: 6
Participatory Democracy: 6
Transport: 6
Deliberative Poll: 5
Design: 5
Ict: 5
Occupy: 5
Protest: 5
Technology: 5
Citizen Deliberation: 4
Civic Participation: 4
Consensus: 4
Conservation: 4
Economic Development: 4
Edem: 4
Equality: 4
Facilitation: 4
Inclusive: 4
Media: 4
Monitoring: 4
Movement: 4
Occupy Wall Street: 4
Parliament: 4
Partizipation: 4
Phone: 4
Politics: 4
Proces: 4
Public Participation: 4
Voluntary And Community Groups: 4
Vote: 4
Argument Map: 3
Cir: 3
Citizen Panel: 3
Citizenship: 3
Civic Interaction: 3
Community Planning: 3
Consensus Conference: 3
Councils: 3
Culture: 3
Democratic Accountability: 3
Democratic Experimentation: 3
Direct Democracy: 3
Election: 3
Energy: 3
Europe: 3
Feminism: 3
Health Care: 3
India: 3
Internet: 3
Lawmaking: 3
Network: 3
Online Deliberation: 3
Online Democracy: 3
Open Government: 3
Pbcensus 1 - Complete Raw Data: 3
Pbcensus 2 - Requires Phone Call: 3
Public Consultation: 3
Representative: 3
Road Safety: 3
Social Innovation: 3
Social Media: 3
Software: 3
Sustainability: 3
Uk: 3
Urban Development: 3
Voters: 3
Active Citizens: 2
Agora Ekklesia: 2
Agricultural Development: 2
Animal Protection: 2
Animal Welfare: 2
Archive: 2
Big Data: 2
BüRgerbeteiligung: 2
BüRgerhaushalt: 2
California Citizens Redistrciting Commission Proposition 11 Voters First Act Senate Assembly Board Of Equalization: 2
Capacity Building: 2
Change: 2
Children: 2
Citizens Assembly: 2
Citizens Jury: 2
Civic Tech: 2
Co-Design: 2
Collaboration: 2
Collaborative Governance: 2
Communal Councils: 2
Community Development: 2
Community-Based Participatory Research: 2
Cycling: 2
Deliberative Polling: 2
Deliberatorium: 2
Delphi: 2
Democratic Innovation: 2
Demopart: 2
DiseñO Colaborativo: 2
Dogs: 2
Doparie: 2
Dred: 2
E-Deliberation: 2
E-Participation: 2
Economic Justice: 2
Ecosystem-Based Management: 2
Edemocracy: 2
Empowerment: 2
Environmental Justice: 2
Facebook: 2
Finland: 2
Freedom Of Speech: 2
Freight: 2
Grassroots: 2
History: 2
Ideation: 2
Ideation Software: 2
Inclusive Decision Making: 2
Indigenous Citizenship: 2
Italy: 2
Land Use: 2
Latin America: 2
Law-Making: 2
Liquid Democracy: 2
Love: 2
Natural Resource Management: 2
Neighbourhood: 2
New Hampshire: 2
Ngo: 2
Nh Listens: 2
Night-Time Economy: 2
Nuclear: 2
Oep: 2
Online Discussion: 2
Onlinepartizipation: 2
Oral Storytelling: 2
Organization: 2
Parliamentary Informatics: 2
Pbcensus 3 - Requires Significant Research: 2
Performance Monitoring: 2
Pets: 2
Platform: 2
Policy: 2
Poverty: 2
Privacy: 2
Process: 2
Recreation: 2
Renewal: 2
Revoution: 2
Rights: 2
Science: 2
Social Justice: 2
Sweden: 2
Sydney: 2
Teaching Tool Student Engagement: 2
Tourism: 2
Town Meeting: 2
Urban Transportation: 2
Victoria: 2
Video: 2
Voting: 2
Waste Management: 2
Wiki: 2
Young People: 2
Youth Education: 2
Youth Engagement: 2
1St Amendment: 1
Accessibility: 1
Affordable Housing: 1
Agenda: 1
Agora 2.0: 1
Agriculture: 1
Airesis: 1
Alabama: 1
Alcohol: 1
Alignment: 1
Alternative Transportation Models: 1
Alternatives: 1
Americans Elect: 1
Anna-Lindh-Salin: 1
Anti-Social Behaviour: 1
Anticipatory Democracy: 1
Applied Innovation: 1
Argument Mapping: 1
Arquitectura: 1
Arthritis: 1
Attention Ecology: 1
Autonomy: 1
Awareness: 1
Backbone Campaign: 1
Beaches: 1
Bike Lane: 1
Bikeway: 1
Bilancio Partecipativo: 1
Blasphemy Laws: 1
Boston: 1
Bulgaria: 1
By The People: 1
BüRgerrat: 1
Cambridge: 1
Canada: 1
Canadian: 1
Cats: 1
Cbwm Community Based Waste Management: 1
Cdd: 1
Cellular: 1
Changeagent: 1
Changeagents: 1
Childcare: 1
Chile: 1
Citizens For Democracy: 1
Citizens Initiative Review: 1
Citizens Manifesto: 1
City Planning: 1
Civic Education: 1
Civic Studies: 1
Civil Disobedience: 1
Civil Society Group: 1
Climate Change: 1
Co-Creation: 1
Co-DiseñO: 1
Collaborative Planning: 1
Collective Decision Making: 1
Colton Schweitzer: 1
Common Ground Theory: 1
Communities: 1
Community Advisory Boards: 1
Community And Voluntray Sector: 1
Community Conservation Agreements: 1
Community Engagements: 1
Community Participation: 1
Community Places: 1
Community Planning Toolkit: 1
Community-Academic Partnership: 1
Community-Engaged Scholarship: 1
Conflict Management: 1
Consciousness-Raising: 1
Constitutional Conventions: 1
Conversational Democracy: 1
Corporate Reform: 1
Corporate Social Responsibility: 1
Corruption: 1
Crime: 1
Critical Reporting: 1
Crowdmapping: 1
Crowdsourced Deliberation System: 1
Cycle Track: 1
Cycling Infrastructure: 1
David Mathews Center For Civic Live Engagement: 1
Decentralization: 1
Decision Theory: 1
Deeper Democracy: 1
Democracy System Market Direct Representative: 1
Democratic Reform: 1
Democratici Diretti: 1
Democrazia Partecipativa: 1
Desarrollo Social: 1
Deutsche Parteien: 1
Digital Democracy: 1
Digital Divide: 1
Digital Engagement: 1
Digital Participation: 1
Digitalengagement: 1
Direct Representation: 1
Disaster Relief: 1
Discussion Board: 1
DiseñO Participativo: 1
DiseñO Social: 1
Dissent: 1
Driving: 1
Dynamic Faciliation: 1
Dynamic Governance: 1
E-Government: 1
Easw: 1
Ebm: 1
Eco-System: 1
Economic Empowerment: 1
Efficiency Evaluation Participation: 1
Egovernment: 1
Elections: 1
Electoral District Forum: 1
Electoral Reform: 1
Endangered Species: 1
England: 1
English: 1
Enquiry By Design: 1
Eparticipation: 1
Eskil Par: 1
European Awarness Scenario Workshop: 1
Exhibition: 1
Experts: 1
EzüRich Epartizipation Ideenwettbewerb ZüRich Digitale Zukunft: 1
Facebook Application: 1
Facilities: 1
Film: 1
Finance: 1
Fishkin: 1
Focus Groups: 1
Food: 1
Forums: 1
Freedom Of Expression: 1
Freerz: 1
Freerz Community: 1
Freerz Manifesto: 1
Friesland: 1
Galatina Città Fertile Politiche Giovanili Italian: 1
Gamba: 1
Gambling: 1
Gamification: 1
Gender Equality: 1
Gender Justice: 1
Global Warming: 1
Gm0: 1
Grassroots Democracy: 1
Growth: 1
Habitats: 1
Haulage: 1
Hcps: 1
Healthy Eating: 1
Highway: 1
Hochschule: 1
Human Needs: 1
Human Rights: 1
Icebreaker: 1
Idea Management: 1
India Democratic Innovations Satyamev Jayate: 1
Indonesia: 1
Indonesien: 1
Industry: 1
Inner Belt: 1
Institutional Reform: 1
International Development: 1
International Education: 1
Interview: 1
Intra-Party Democracy: 1
Ireland: 1
Irish Constitution Constitutional Convention Irish: 1
Italiano: 1
Journalism: 1
Knowledge Presentation: 1
Kommunalebene: 1
KöNigslutter;Landschaftsplan;Kubicek;Lippa;Westholm;Politische PartißZipation: 1
Landscape: 1
Large Scale Consultations: 1
Law Amending: 1
Lay People: 1
Legal Affairs: 1
Legal Information: 1
Legislative Information: 1
Liquid Feedback: 1
Livestream: 1
Living Democracy: 1
Local Economy: 1
Local Equality: 1
Local Governance: 1
Local Self-Reliance: 1
Lore Lindu National Park: 1
Maps: 1
Marginalization: 1
Marrickville: 1
Massachusetts: 1
Media Reform: 1
Melbourne: 1
Memorandum: 1
Mental Health: 1
Meta-Theory: 1
Michigan: 1
Ministerium FüR Innovation: 1
Mockery: 1
Money: 1
Montevideo: 1
Morocco: 1
Moveon Move On: 1
Munich: 1
Municipal Politics: 1
Nanotechnology: 1
Neighborhood: 1
Nepal: 1
Net Neutrality: 1
New Hampshire Department Of Resources And Economic Development (Dred): 1
New Hampshire Office Of Energy And Planning (Oep): 1
New South Wales: 1
Nh Department Of Resources And Economic Development (Dred).: 1
Nh Listens Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan: 1
Nh Office Of Energy And Planning (Oep): 1
Niedersachsen;Demokratie: 1
Night Life: 1
Nightlife: 1
Nonpartisian: 1
Noosa: 1
Nordrhein-Westfalen: 1
Nuclear Fuel: 1
Nuclear Waste: 1
Obesity: 1
Occupy Vancouver: 1
Oct 15: 1
Online Forum: 1
Online Tools For Deliberation: 1
Open Calls: 1
Open Democracy: 1
Open Policy Making: 1
Open Space Technology: 1
Opengov: 1
Outcomes: 1
Outdoor Space Organization: 1
Overweight: 1
Pakistan: 1
Panels: 1
Parliament Monitoring: 1
Partecipazione: 1
ParticipacióN Ciudadana: 1
ParticipacióN Comunitaria: 1
Participatory Grants-Making: 1
Participatory Planning: 1
Participatory Strategic Plan: 1
People Power: 1
Personality: 1
Petition: 1
Pipeline: 1
Pirate Parties: 1
Polarizing: 1
Policing: 1
Policy Panel: 1
Political Accountability: 1
Political Parties: 1
Portugal: 1
Poverty Alleviation: 1
Precarity: 1
Presupuesto Participativo Ciudadanos Democracia Participativa: 1
Pro-Poor Solutions: 1
Procedural Competencies: 1
Processi Decisionali Inclusivi: 1
Project Cycle Management: 1
Proxy Voting: 1
Public Comment: 1
Public Conversation: 1
Public Education: 1
Public Space: 1
Queensland: 1
Racial Equality: 1
Racial Justice: 1
Radical Feminism: 1
Random Selection: 1
Regulation: 1
Representative Democracy: 1
Residential Planning: 1
Resistance: 1
Responsabilità Sociale: 1
Restorative Justice: 1
Revolution: 1
Right To Shelter: 1
Rotation: 1
Rural: 1
San Antonio: 1
Schools: 1
Science Public Engagement Participation: 1
Sdd: 1
Service-Learning: 1
Seville: 1
Shipping: 1
Shop Local: 1
Shoreline Master Program Smp Sma Update: 1
Slums: 1
Small Business: 1
Small Group-Facilitated Dialogue: 1
Sms Messages: 1
Social Movement: 1
Social Networking: 1
Social Ventures: 1
Sociocracy: 1
South Australia: 1
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands: 1
Spd: 1
Speed Dating: 1
Spokes Council: 1
Sports: 1
Stadt KöLn: 1
Stadtplanung: 1
Stakeholder Engagement: 1
Stammtisch 2.0: 1
Stammtisch 3.0: 1
Statewide Convener: 1
Strategic Planning: 1
Street Sharing: 1
Structured Dialogic Design: 1
Student Governments: 1
Student Participant: 1
Student-Led: 1
Studenten: 1
StudienqualitäT: 1
Studierendenzufriedenheit: 1
Study Circles: 1
Sulawesi: 1
Super Pac: 1
Sussidiarietà: 1
Sustainable Mobility: 1
Taxi: 1
Teachers Training: 1
Textizen Philadelphia: 1
Theory On Procedures: 1
Threatened Species: 1
Time-Credits: 1
Tony Elia: 1
Toolbox: 1
Toolkit: 1
Transgender Activism: 1
Trauma: 1
Tribes: 1
Twitter: 1
Ubc Class 2015: 1
Umbrella Group: 1
United Nations: 1
United States: 1
UniversitäT: 1
Urban Mobility: 1
Urban Politics: 1
Urban Renewal: 1
Urban Stream Restoration: 1
Us Politics: 1
Venezuela: 1
Violence Against Women: 1
Virtual Parliament: 1
Vision: 1
Voice: 1
Volksentscheid: 1
Voter Free-Rider Problem: 1
Voter Information: 1
Waste Valuation: 1
Watershed Governance: 1
Western Australia: 1
Wicked Problems: 1
Wildlife Management: 1
Wisdom Council: 1
Wissenschaft Und Forschung Des Landes Nordrheinwestfalen (Miwf): 1
Women-Friendly City: 1
Working Together: 1
Wwviews: 1
You Choose Redbridge Budget Consultation Tool: 1
Youth Development: 1
Youtube: 1
ÖFfentlichkeitsbeteiligung: 1
Cell Phone: 0
Citizen'S Dialogue: 0
Mobile Phone: 0
Oregon Citizen'S Initiative Review: 0
OK, deleting all the 0's (?) and 1's would take us down to 200 tag options. Is that a good enough reduction for now? I would imagine we have to run this by the wider team at some point. But if we just need a cleanup for this phase to test, I'd say go with that.
Hmm..I don't think deleting all the 0s would necessarily be the right way to go about this - I think it's better to see which ones are actually useful for PPedia purposes rather than how many people have used them. Reason being: there are a lot of entries by the same author that use the same tags; those entries were created early on (2011-2012) and then those tags just got picked up by later authors (ie. they clicked whatever came up as an option when they started typing). I'd like to take go through and pick out those I think would be most useful moving forward. Obviously this is going to be subjective so I'll let you guys weigh in on my top 100 and then send it to Pat for final approval. Sound good?
@scottofletcher sounds great! Thanks for taking this on. You can tag @plscully here as well, and keep all the work in one place. Thanks!
Will do! I'll make a Google Sheet so everything stays online
@scottofletcher @jesicarson @dethe -- I like Scott's plan as a starting point. After a very quick skim through the list it seems as though even many of the tags with the largest number of hits can be deleted, e.g., participatory, budgeting, etc. Anything that is easily captured in typical search such as the name of a country, the name of an organization, etc. I'm happy to give this a once through after Scott has finished.
@plscully @jesicarson @dethe @davidascher Follow my progress here and feel free to edit/comment https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o_khNAl0GAx_6jgkt5_wiLLDLYZq9lHLThNIaRnp59k/edit?usp=sharing Also, just a note: we might want to keep some heavily used tags like 'Participatory Budgeting' IF users can sort entries by tag AND where the 'tag' sorting option is relative to other sorting labels (eg. method, which would make PB unnecessary as a tag). On the current platform you can't sort by tag and I think they're mostly used for SEO
Note: During user testing, two testers pointed out that it was disconcerting that the word they began typing didn't show up in the list of tags. This also ties into the issue of "other" in form fields, and when / where we request users submit suggestions (design needed).
related: #550
What tags were they looking for? I can't imagine any word they might have typed that didn't come up seeing as how many tags there are... I'm also not sure how many tags to include in my condensed list because it partly depends on whether or not the tags are going to be accessible for sorting (see, for example, the 'Categories' drop down menu on Tiago's blog: https://democracyspot.net/)
As of now, tags are not viewed in a list anywhere (just show up when you begin typing) but we can change this once the list is more curated. In that case, maybe we should call this field something other than tags, since tags are typically user-generated?
Agreed - Wikipedia calls them categories and they can be seen at the bottom of the page. Eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy
This one has a crazy amount https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom - I don't think we need to have as many
@plscully Can you review Scott's work on the tags triage and let us know if that is approved before we go through the data form overhaul? Thanks! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o_khNAl0GAx_6jgkt5_wiLLDLYZq9lHLThNIaRnp59k/edit?usp=sharing
Also note that Jesi and I talked and decided to go with user-defined tags but agreed that I'd go through them once a month or so to cleanup ones that are irrelevant/unrelated, duplicates, or contain grammatical/spelling errors
Not sure that’s a final decision, but we did discuss that. Keep hearing that user entered stuff just gets messy and not useful data anyway. So not sure on this one. Figured for now we’d just offer the list of tags from you and see if anyone requests to add more via the contact feature (still to be designed) that applies to list select entries.
Sorry, shouldn't have said we decided - I'm good with whatever is going to give us the best data and the best user experience
Can someone please clarify what the purpose of the tagging system is to be in the new site? I'm embarrassed to say that I don't recall exactly we intended the purpose of tagging to be in the Drupal site. It may not be a good idea to keep them if we're not confident they serve a useful purpose.
Do we want our new tags to be like Wikimedia's user-generated "categories"? Or if we want them to be primarily for SEO, how important is it to keep them, or even reduce their number? As someone who is not familiar with the ins & outs of tags, I found this article on Wikipedia to be useful.
To my knowledge the 'categories' function on both Wikipedia and Wikimedia isn't user generated - at least not the same extent that ours are right now. IE it's like the methods field where users are limited to selecting those categories that already exist. That's how Wikipedia/media cuts out the spam. We're currently wide open to spam but Jesi thought it might be a good idea to leave the field open-ended to give users more freedom - I agree but our stipulation would be that I'd have access to them and would go through and 'cull' the spam/useless tags once every so often.
Just read this - Wikipedia 'heads off' changes to categories: "Almost all category name changes are made pursuant to a consensus decision at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion". I'd assume that goes for new categories and changes to sub-categories
Hey Scott - Thank you for this helpful clarification. Whether the field is wide open or subject to our approval, this still begs the question of what purpose tags will serve on our site. I like the idea of a categories function if it works the way Wikipedia's does, but if we go down that path we may want to wait until we see how people use the new data model before adding that type of categories/tags function.
@dethe @andrea are tags useful to make the site more searchable via the ppedia search bar and also do they make us more findable on google? Can you weigh in on Pat's question about why any site would use tags? I'd also like to know. Thanks!
Tagging is a fun topic.
From Flickr:
" Folksonomy is a neologism for a practice of collaborative categorization using freely chosen keywords. This feature began appearing in a variety of social software in 2004. Some examples of online folksonomies being social bookmarking sites like del.icio.us and Jots (jots.com/) which are bookmark sharing sites, Flickr, for photo sharing, 43 Things, for goal sharing, GenieLab and Upto11, for music recommendations and associations, and Tagsurf (tagsurf.com/), for tag-based discussions. Gmail's labeling system is somewhat similar to the use of tags, but it is not a folksonomy as users cannot share their categorizations. Folksonomy is not directly related to the concept of faceted classification from library science.
Folksonomy is currently understood somewhat narrowly as "tagging." Social sciences and anthropology have long studied "folk classifications"—how average people (non-experts) classify the world around them. One reference is Harold Conklin's Folk Classification: A Topically Arranged Bibliography of Contemporary and Background References Through 1971 (1972, ISBN 0913516023)
Folksonomies work best when a large number of users all describe the same piece of information. For instance, on del.icio.us, many people have bookmarked Wikipedia (del.icio.us/url/bca8b85b54a7e6c01a1bcfaf15be1df5), each with a different set of words to describe it. Among the various tags used, del.icio.us shows that reference, wiki, and encyclopedia are the most popular.
"Jon Udell (2004) argues that the idea of abandoning taxonomy in favor of lists of keywords is not new, and that the fundamental difference in these systems is feedback."[1] (www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communicati...)
A portmanteau of the words folk (or folks) and taxonomy, the term folksonomy has been attributed to Thomas Vander Wal. Taxonomy is from "taxis" and "nomos" (from Greek). Taxis means classification. Nomos (or nomia) means management. Folk is people (from German). So folksonomy means people's classification management. "
The question for the project is the degree to which you want "random users" to build their own categorization approaches, including whether to layer tags on top of other people's content, or whether you want to "own" the categorization.
I will say that I think folksonomies in practice seem to require a very large number of users to work, and they make localization impossible. So my personal bias (which I'm happy to put aside) is to not support user-submitted tags, to encourage people to make 'reading lists' as their curation process, but to have tags be authoritative and decided by core staff, and let entry authors just "pick" from that list. That list should fairly short if it's to be useful.
I agree with David on the limited list of tags - see this document for the list I came up with https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o_khNAl0GAx_6jgkt5_wiLLDLYZq9lHLThNIaRnp59k/edit?usp=sharing I used the NCDD website and Tiago Piexoto's blog for inspiration but ultimately tried to choose words and phrases that were more abstract or 'broader' than the current data fields. I think it would be interesting to allow users to sort by tag since that's what I usually do when I go to a new website or I'm doing broad research around a new or unfamiliar topic. For example, I may be interested in cases where citizens took 'direct action' which is easier to understand than trying to sort cases by purpose (Independent Action, Protest, Social Mobilization, etc.) or method (protest, community organizing etc.) - terms which new users may not be familiar with. The ability to curate reading lists is also an interesting idea but wouldn't really have any impact on data or SEO. I do think we need to keep Jesi's comment in mind: part of the Participedia project (esp. InterPARES) is understanding how people categorize or interpret broad concepts like 'participation' or single instances or events (eg. someone labelling a case 'failure' or 'government inattention' might tell us something about public perception). If tags aren't available to users and are just 'in the background' (like on our current website) then they wouldn't be too much of a problem. We could also limit the number of tags to, say, five. I think doing a periodic cleanup would also work (we'd only have to get rid of ones with spelling errors). Another thing I've been meaning to bring up - and which carries relevance for tags, methods, and topics/issues - is the auto-complete function: is it possible to have more 'intelligent' suggestions? For example, if I'm writing a case on a protest, I'd start typing "P-R-O" into the methods field which gives me things like "Initiative PROcess", "Parliamentary PROcess" and "PROtest". However, once I've selected Protest, it would be helpful if there was a list of similar/related methods and a prompt like "Other cases that used that method also used..." That would be helpful for two main reasons: 1 - authors tend to leave out methods. For example, they may select an 'overarching' method like Participatory Budgeting but leave out the deliberative tools like Future Workshops or Dynamic Facilitation. 2 - sometimes it's difficult to know which method to enter. I might enter 'Information and Communications Technology' when I actually meant 'Audience Response Systems' but didn't have the right wording or was unfamiliar with the vocabulary.
"tags" as we are using them now (on .xyz) are much more like categories in that we have a fixed set that users can choose from, rather than allowing users to create their own. They differ from some site's categories because we allow more than one to be in effect at a time. For me, the main issues with user-entered tags are:
Localization: is the tag "women" show as (and searchable as) "mujere" if the user is viewing in Español?
Fragmentation: if users create tags "organizational," "organisational," "orgs," "organization," and "organizations" do we recognize those as fundamentally the same or group them in any way? If not, then we get a LOT of tags that each point to one or two things, rather than useful grouping.
--Dethe
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:42 AM, jesicarson notifications@github.com wrote:
@dethe https://github.com/dethe @Andrea https://github.com/andrea are tags useful to make the site more searchable via the ppedia search bar and also do they make us more findable on google? Can you weigh in on Pat's question about why any site would use tags? I'd also like to know. Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/participedia/frontend/issues/445#issuecomment-335552183, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABBufGlaMS3uPJEOUwG0Pflepz4Umr2ks5sq6x4gaJpZM4N2Qms .
I like the description that @dethe gave about how tags will work on xyz. (Especially since I still can't fathom what purpose they serve on the current site.) If we continue down this path, then we will need to pay close attention to how we generate and sign off on the approved tags. Will it create problems if we hold off on finalizing the list until after the data models are updated? Also, will we be able to use localization to create standardized translations for the tags?
current list is insane: