Closed ai closed 9 years ago
I think it is a Sassy way.
Well I'm still pretty Sassy ;-)
It also crossed my mind that there could be name conflicts with the at-rules, but honestly I think that risk is very low. One idea was to prefix them with something like @qq-exactly 6
. More typing...
I like your idea of pseudo hooks though, I will give it a shot. Maybe keep both syntax at the user discretion. Let's see.
Yeap, I think about two syntaxes too to not broke the API
Done in 0.2.0
Awesome. Now we better that Sass mixin :D
Thanks for the suggestion !
@pascalduez why you use at-rules? I think it is a Sassy way.
I see 2 problems:
@exactly
may have confict with many other plugins, becuase maybe other plugin has some “exactly” idea.:nth-child
.This is a first draft idea (with postcss-nested):