Open miquelfire opened 9 years ago
Hello Miguel, yea I saw that a long time ago but didn't really think it was necessary since our tld list was already pretty big and no one complained other than one person which I added manually after I saw a comment wanting it lol So think it would really be a useful thing?
This is more a of a long term thing to add.
Ideally, I would like to kinda have a fork of PasswordMaker as a whole (Not sure what to call it, as the online version is 2, some versions are called Pro, but the current algorithm would be the legacy algorithm) and this would be something to include in the changes (like dropping Leet, it only exists because PasswordMaker didn't have character sets, and the passwords it created were of the hex strings)
The amount of work to create is too large for our small group to think about doing now anyway.
@miquelfire Just tried replacing the tld's we have with the full public_suffix_list.dat data and interestingly there is no perf hit compared to the old list with how I'm testing it here: https://measurethat.net/Benchmarks/Show/29346/0/the-public-suffix-list-set-or-obj-loop-2 but not really sure if its worth an extra 138KB of TLD data.
https://www.publicsuffix.org/
No hurry as other editions will need to find a way to use this (without hurting performance...)