Closed tyteen4a03 closed 4 years ago
I don't get you, can you provide an example? Thank you!
<a id="top">
and clicking on <a href="#top">
does not work since yrv takes over trying to route it when it should be going to the #top
.
Oh gotcha! Do you think is fine to ignore all anchors except those starting with #/
instead? 🤔
Maybe have it configurable so that when using the history API it ignores all fragments.
I don't plan on using hash and not allowing /
is technically breaking the rules but eh.
Any progress on this issue? :)
Hi, the only way I found to detect these kind of events is through e.isTrusted
— so, when true seems to be from regular anchor elements.
Otherwise I'm not able to found a way to differentiate because e
does not include the element that originated the navigation change.
Update: seems like the same event is fired whenever the user clicks on back/fwd buttons, so is not suitable the isTrusted
way — do you have in mind a way to differentiate between anchors and router links?
What do you think?
I think a new issue would fit better, if I understood, we could add a particular attribute on those links we want to ignore, right?
How do I instruct yrv to ignore anchor fragments?