Open SomeCallMeDave opened 9 years ago
Agreed
On 16 Apr 2015, at 16:47, David Fashena wrote:
Should “decreased fatigability” be a type of “increased strength” rather than the other way around? Similarly, should "increased fatigability" be a type of "decreased strength"?
thank you, Dave Fashena, ZFIN
The current situation:
TERM: decreased fatigability OBO ID [ID]: PATO:0001817 Synonyms: low fatigability Definition: A fatigability which is relatively low. decreased_in_magnitude_relative_to: normal is a type of: decreased strength • fatigability ———————————————— TERM: increased fatigability OBO ID [ID]: PATO:0001816 Synonyms: high fatigability Definition: A fatigability which is relatively high. increased_in_magnitude_relative_to: normal is a type of: fatigability • increased strength
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/gkoutos/pato/issues/54
I'm closing this as it was fixed, the subsequently broken, which was noticed by your colleague in #54 - we'll use that ticket from here
Should “decreased fatigability” be a type of “increased strength” rather than the other way around? Similarly, should "increased fatigability" be a type of "decreased strength"?
thank you, Dave Fashena, ZFIN
The current situation:
TERM: decreased fatigability OBO ID [ID]: PATO:0001817 Synonyms: low fatigability Definition: A fatigability which is relatively low. decreased_in_magnitude_relative_to: normal is a type of: decreased strength • fatigability ———————————————— TERM: increased fatigability OBO ID [ID]: PATO:0001816 Synonyms: high fatigability Definition: A fatigability which is relatively high. increased_in_magnitude_relative_to: normal is a type of: fatigability • increased strength