search

patricegautier / unifiZabbix

Zabbix templates to monitor pretty much all Unifi devices
183 stars 36 forks source link

Import failed #64

Open ubayebx opened 2 years ago

ubayebx commented 2 years ago

Hey man, apreciate for what you did in here, but i have some issue, can u help me for a bit sorry for my bad english

image

i always get this when i try to import your yaml template

patricegautier commented 2 years ago

which version of zabbix are you importing into?

ubayebx commented 2 years ago

zabbix_server (Zabbix) 6.0.9

patricegautier commented 2 years ago

For what it's worth, I do my testing on 6.2.3.. Any chance you can upgrade?

MrLasVegasSTL commented 2 years ago

To get it to import in 6.0, you change the beginning of the template to the following and update your data field. The two changes are version to 6.0 and from template_groups to just groups.

zabbix_export: version: '6.0' date: 'date' groups:

patricegautier commented 2 years ago

so have you been using the template with 6.0, any other issues to reports?

MrLasVegasSTL commented 2 years ago

I have used it on 5.x for a while and just did another install on 6.0. It works the same as far as I can tell, other than the template import changes. I've never gotten the wifi-site feature working with a UDM-Pro yet, but I think that is more on my own effort than fault of the project..

I have noticed at scale (like hundreds of unifi devices) this starts to degrade in performance compared to just SMNP. I had to increase zabbix performance settings like pollers, and I think it might be conflicting with my unifi controllers ability to check in on this many as well. I started seening the devices disconnecting. So I just keep it setup and enable it when I want more info for troubleshooting, at this scale.

patricegautier commented 2 years ago

I have noticed at scale (like hundreds of unifi devices) this starts to degrade in performance compared to just SMNP. I had to increase zabbix performance settings like pollers

Aha! I finally got around to packaging 1.3 which has a good performance improvement there which might help. Take a look..

MrLasVegasSTL commented 2 years ago

How exactly do I take a look? - I am kind of an amateur at GitHub, I only see the Master set of code (As far as I understand this).

Sorry! lol