Open mjo22 opened 6 months ago
I think this should be supported! I'd be happy to take a PR adjusting this.
Okay sounds good! I will try to find some time to put one together.
Hello, wanted to update you that unfortunately I don’t think I’ll be able to get to this sometime soon (sorry about that). My solution in the meantime is to just relax my strict=True requirement.
The following is not allowed in the abstract/final pattern
Here, the custom constructor requires that the
__init__
be of a certain form. However, one may not necessarily want set the same exact fields even if the arguments to the__init__
are the same. Is there a reason this does not fall into the abstract/final design pattern? Or should this be supported withstrict = True
?