Closed DannyJieweiLi closed 7 years ago
Hi Danny,
Thanks for your comment!
Yes, all your observations are correct. The high resolution model would not help much since it's doing landmarks-fitting. Here's two things:
1) You can build something on top of eos - i.e. use the result of the landmark fitting to do some more precise fitting, e.g. analysis-by-synthesis, Shape-from-Shading, or something like that. There's a ton of literature about it.
2) I have plans to improve the fitting of eos, and will work on that over the next months. However there will nothing be ready soon, and it will definitely take a few months, and I cannot promise any results at this point.
Thanks your reply, Patrick. I will look into the detail keeping algorithms. ^_^
great,author!
Great, I will close the issue in the mean time. I will update it when I make some improvements to the fitting algorithm. It's also worth following the releases of eos. Also feel free to update this issue if you implement something! :-) Thanks!
I noticed that the fitting module of eos only contains code of fitting landmarks (related to function fitting::fit_shape_and_pose). The result 3D model is smooth and do not have much details. Is there any way to improve the details (i.e wrinkles) of the result model? I thought that the detail missing is caused by the low resolution of morphable model (3448 vertices model). But even I used the higher resolution model, I do not get the expected details.