I am not sure whether this is appropriate or not. But here is my thought about this sentence on page 128 -
Whenever the FIXNUM_FLAG is set, Ruby knows this VALUE is really a small integer, an
instance of the Fixnum class, and not a pointer to a value structure.
Could it be considered to be rephrased to below sentence for more clarity ?
Whenever the FIXNUM_FLAG is set, Ruby knows this VALUE is really a small integer, an
instance of the Fixnum class, and not a pointer to its corresponding C structure.
I am not sure whether this is appropriate or not. But here is my thought about this sentence on page 128 -
Whenever the FIXNUM_FLAG is set, Ruby knows this VALUE is really a small integer, an instance of the Fixnum class, and not a pointer to a value structure.
Could it be considered to be rephrased to below sentence for more clarity ?
Whenever the FIXNUM_FLAG is set, Ruby knows this VALUE is really a small integer, an instance of the Fixnum class, and not a pointer to its corresponding C structure.
Thanks !