Closed aproposts closed 7 months ago
Thanks for the PR. I'm not ignoring it but I've not had a chance to look at it as yet.
29.2 was just released. For such a complex project, should we propose a manually verified package?
I updated the package for 29.2, and it was approved. This PR is no longer needed.
Thanks for submitting it and apologies it took so long to get there.
Description
The package tests were failing because the zips for 29.1 don't have the
emacs-$version
pattern of earlier releases. I changed the install script to account for the change then ran the AU update.ps1.Motivation and Context
It fixes the issue for 29.1, but it's probably a breaking change for earlier versions, not sure how you'd want to handle that.
https://github.com/pauby/ChocoPackages/issues/199
How Has this Been Tested?
I forked this repo, mucked around a bit before finding out the structure of the new and old emacs zips are different. After that, it was pretty clear to modify the parameters sent to
Get-ChocolateyUnzip
, run the AUupdate.ps1
and runchoco install emacs.portable --debug --verbose --source .
from theemacs.portable
directory without issue.Tested on Windows 10 Pro
Types of changes
Checklist: