Open paul-crowe opened 2 years ago
Summary: "Many effective altruists donate to GiveWell’s top charities. All three of these charities work in global health. Is that because GiveWell knows that global health is the highest-leverage cause? No. It’s because it was the only one with enough data to say anything very useful about." Global health is supported because that's the only area with any real data to support it being high-impact.
Date: 12/2/2013
Status:
Lag to response:
Current canonical instance:
Prior status of critic:
Fundamental criticism:
Public responses:
Public responses:
Summary: "EA seems to have picked all the low-hanging fruit and doesn't know what to do with itself now."
Date: 7/2/2017
Status:
Lag to response:
Current canonical instance:
Prior status of critic:
Fundamental criticism:
Public responses:
Summary: EA is too limited to the same old causes of animals, AI and world poverty.
Date: 1/26/2018
Status:
Lag to response:
Current canonical instance:
Prior status of critic:
Fundamental criticism:
Public responses:
Example: RCT development will never scale
Summary: "A top priority for effective altruists should be to assess the best way to increase human welfare outside of the constraints of randomista development, i.e. allowing intervention that have not or cannot be tested by RCTs"
Date: 1/16/2020
Status:
Lag to response:
Current canonical instance:
Prior status of critic:
Fundamental Criticism:
Public responses:
Givewell have been failing to go beyond RCTs since 2017 (16th Aug 2020)
GiveWell mentioned in september 2020 that they hadn't looked into the ONE Campaign or the Borgen Project, but may in the future (October 21, 2020)
Considered and rejected charter cities in 2021 (12th Jun 2021)
07/07/2021: emailed the ONE campaign and the Borgen Project for updates- add them here <----- (10/10/2021: No response.)