Closed jgottula closed 1 year ago
For now, I'll just wait. Maybe they'll fix it. Short of writing my own macro, there's not much I can do. Also, the docs don't say how backward compatible adding an argument would be to older autoconf
.
Waiting didn't work since there's no upstream fix. I've instead worked around the issue with f02a78657afb6ddbeb9e66c8becfacad6ad9dea1.
Building this project with autoconf 2.70 gives the following warning:
It appears that
AC_PROG_LEX
was updated in 2.70 to take a somewhat-required-ish parameter: https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.70/html_node/Particular-Programs.html#index-AC_005fPROG_005fLEX-1And it seems that
AX_PROG_FLEX
usesAC_PROG_LEX
viaAM_PROG_LEX
; andax_prog_flex.m4
hasn't yet been updated to deal with the newAC_PROG_LEX
parameter.Don't necessarily know whether there's a lot to do right now, since
ax_prog_flex.m4
upstream is still using the legacy syntax. But in any case, it's something to be aware of, I suppose.