Open david-davies opened 2 weeks ago
I believe it was an error on the Typst team's part to allow prooftree
as a package name in the first place, because it is too descriptive. I'm not sure it makes sense to delete your package, nor does it make sense to now start using the prooftree
name for the aforementioned reason. Of course, Paul will decide, as the owner of the package, but I think you could just change your README on Typst Universe to mention that prooftree
is deprecated, and curryst
should now be used (if you feel like it, of course).
In the meantime I'll do as you suggested; mark it as deprecated and point towards curryst
.
Hi, (Apologies for using an issue to communicate, I couldn't find an email contact) I authored and then abandoned the
prooftree
package. Please let me know if you'd like to use that package name, ascurryst
is better and actually maintained. I don't want to be hogging theprooftree
namespace :)Best, David