Closed XLuHouston closed 6 years ago
Hi, Can you post the code / results so I can reproduce what you are seeing?
Sure.
Cisplatin.GCP <- getCGPinfo(drug = "Cisplatin", tissueType = "allSolidTumors", dataset = "cgp2014")
Cisplatin.GCP.ic50 <- Cisplatin.GCP[[1]]
Cisplatin.GCP.expr <- Cisplatin.GCP[[2]]; colnames(Cisplatin.GCP.expr) <- names(Cisplatin.GCP.ic50)
> Cisplatin.GCP.ic50
5637 22RV1 23132-87 639-V 769-P 786-0 8505C
1.508200 3.230500 4.099700 1.773000 2.782200 1.496300 3.544400
........
EFM-19 EFO-21 EFO-27 EGI-1 EPLC-272H ES1 ES3
5.499900 3.516600 2.578700 2.407100 2.568100 0.023724 -0.146880
#prediction using my data as testmatrix
predictedPtype <- pRRopheticPredict(testMatrix = as.matrix(log2(FPKM.HUGO[,rownames(annCol)] + 1)),drug = "Cisplatin",tissueType = "allSolidTumors",selection = 1)
Is there anything more you need?
Sorry, I was wrong. I have figured it out, the IC50 was Ln transformed. Thank you.
Hi there,
Sorry, I have asked a lot of questions and I have to bother you again cuz I am performing some drug prediction analysis and I need to interpret the results.
I checked IC50 values in GDSC website and most of it are very small like 0.00035. And the IC50 value I got from getGCPinfo() is really big (even some negative value) so this value should have been processed, but I think the transformation is not powertransformed in this part.
In the first time I thought it may be transformed by -ln (IC50), but in the Genome Research paper you mentioned that lower values of imputed response (estimated IC50) imply greater drug sensitivity, which means I am wrong. Because if the original IC50 = 0.0003, -ln(0.0003)=8 and -ln(0.0001)=9.
Sorry maybe you have explained it somewhere in your paper but I really miss it, so could you please tell me how to interpret the IC50 value in your data?