Closed dadadamarine closed 2 years ago
I agree with this PR. Why not support geometry collections by encoding each geometry separately. Makes sense. The only possible issue is that it's no longer a close mapping between geojson and mvt. if you go geojson -> mvt -> geojson the collection will become individual features. Not a big deal, but FYI.
However, this has nothing to do with winding-order. Winding-order refers to the individual rings within a single polygon. That is fully supported by the existing code.
Thank you.
support collection marshaling in mvt.
winding-order
sample