paulscherrerinstitute / pyzebra

GNU General Public License v3.0
3 stars 2 forks source link

march 2021 issues #24

Closed zaharko closed 3 years ago

zaharko commented 3 years ago

'generic'

'ccl integration'

'param study'

'spind'

ivan-usov commented 3 years ago

One note to the first point in 'generic': 'intercept' is the value of y when x=0, so if the 'slope' is fixed to 0 (as suggested), then the 'intercept' is equal to +-infinity Thus, I fixed the 'intercept' at 0 too, which is probably what you wanted.

ivan-usov commented 3 years ago

Concerning the last open task ("fitted values should be displayed in parameter table, then they can be easily modified and no 'mouse-clicking option' is needed"), right now we display all fit parameters in the "Export file preview" field. After downloading that text file one could modify any fit parameter with a normal text editor. Does it solve the initial problem?

zaharko commented 3 years ago

It is not very comfortable, But okay if modifying parameter table in Pyzebra is a tedious task

On 5 Oct 2021, at 16:47, Ivan Usov @.**@.>> wrote:

Concerning the last open task ("fitted values should be displayed in parameter table, then they can be easily modified and no 'mouse-clicking option' is needed"), right now we display all fit parameters in the "Export file preview" field. After downloading that text file one could modify any fit parameter with a normal text editor. Does it solve the initial problem?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/24#issuecomment-934479627, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMBMFVGET5NPTPJWDSOKOF3UFMFWTANCNFSM4ZAGZZ3Q. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOShttps://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Androidhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.

[ { @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/24#issuecomment-934479627", "url": "https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/24#issuecomment-934479627", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

ivan-usov commented 3 years ago

Alternatively, you could fix an initial value in parameter table to a desired value and set it to non-variable. This might be even a better practical solution. What do you think about it?

zaharko commented 3 years ago

fitting separately a single scan with some parameters fixed and displaying the parameters afterwards in parameter plot work, so the 'issue' was not valid.