Closed zaharko closed 3 years ago
Changed from
#zebra_mode
nb
#zebra_mode
to
#begin zebra_mode
nb
#end
which is consistent with the rest of .cami specs
I would suggest to keep rootpath
and filelist
as they were before, otherwise one would need to modify all old .cami files
Is it dist1
or dist2
? And I believe the path in hdf is /entry1/ZEBRA/area_detector2/distance
, is it correct?
I would suggest to either separate cell
values with commas, or separate UB
values with spaces, so that both are consistent
Ivan,
I am personally for no commas, But the old software uses UB input with commas Therefore I suggest to have presently commas in cell parameters and UB.
Oksana
On 29 Jun 2021, at 11:44, Ivan Usov @.**@.>> wrote:
I would suggest to either separate cell values with commas, or separate UB values with spaces, so that both are consistent
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/32#issuecomment-870445331, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMBMFVDFOFRZPMIYSXW7V2LTVGIZJANCNFSM47ODBKJA.
[ { @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/32#issuecomment-870445331", "url": "https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/32#issuecomment-870445331", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]
I do not know should it be dist1 or dist2 How should we number them? Dist1 for 1d detector Dist2 for 2D detector?
You are right, the distance for the area detector is saved in entry1/ZEBRA/area_detector2/distance
On 29 Jun 2021, at 11:36, Ivan Usov @.**@.>> wrote:
Is it dist1 or dist2? And I believe the path in hdf is /entry1/ZEBRA/area_detector2/distance, is it correct?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/32#issuecomment-870439866, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMBMFVBMTSYQMER3BTA3PTLTVGHZPANCNFSM47ODBKJA.
[ { @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/32#issuecomment-870439866", "url": "https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/32#issuecomment-870439866", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]
OK, i'll go with dist1
for now, and I don't have any strong opinion about the naming for the actual devices.
I write here entries from cami file which could be sometimes rewritten to perform correct calculations in pyzebra or any other new software working with zebra hdf files: