Closed zaharko closed 2 years ago
Based on 1.1 in https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/pyzebra/issues/41 it was 2theta
for both, bi- and nb-geometries.
But I can add a new column gamma
to fix the current issue.
Ok, splitting all scans into 2 tables based on their geometries sounds like an option. The only tradeoff I see is that if all scans are of the same geometry, the second table will just occupy space. Though, maybe it's also helpful to know there are only one geometry scans. Which option would you prefer?
Splitting the table might be more difficult than expected. Maybe I'll return to it later if you still think it significantly improves UX.
'Ccl integrate' nb-geometry Gamma is missing. The systematic way would be to have different subtables for bi- and nb- geometries For bi- 2theta, om, chi,phi For nb - gamma, om, nu