Closed humbertosartini closed 7 years ago
Hello!
Could you reduce template timeout on your device?
This message:
2017-03-30 14:40:49,082 [INFO] We don't have a template for flowset_id: 256 but it's not an error if this message disappears in 5-10 seconds. We need some time to learn it!
Confirms that FNM received netflow correctly but could not calculate traffic because it haven't yet received required template for Netflow data :)
Hello @pavel-odintsov
I´m using this template on Cisco Router:
ASR-1002#show running-config flow monitor V4_OUT Current configuration: ! flow monitor V4_OUT description "IPv4 OUT" exporter V4_EXPORT record netflow ipv4 original-output ! On Cisco site there is this explanation: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/fnetflow/configuration/15-mt/fnf-15-mt-book/get-start-cfg-fnflow.html#GUID-400C1F82-9A50-4DF1-BAFD-E6A20889909E
Is necessary apply a specific configuration on flow to work weel with FNM?
I checked the templates in the router and it has this:
ASR-1002#show flow exporter templates Flow Exporter EXPORT: Client: Flow Monitor V4_OUT Exporter Format: NetFlow Version 9 Template ID : 258 Source ID : 256 Record Size : 50 Template layout
Client: Flow Monitor V4_IN Exporter Format: NetFlow Version 9 Template ID : 259 Source ID : 512 Record Size : 50 Template layout
Client: Flow Monitor V6_OUT Exporter Format: NetFlow Version 9 Template ID : 0 Source ID : 0 Record Size : 94 Template layout
Client: Flow Monitor V6_IN Exporter Format: NetFlow Version 9 Template ID : 0 Source ID : 0 Record Size : 94 Template layout
Hello!
It's very strange actually. According to your output, it should work well. But for some reasons, FNM could not decode traffic.
Do you have any intermediate boxes between FNM and your devices?
Hello,
The equipments are in same network, obvious there is a switch, but is a connection in Layer 2 only.
Unfortunately I do not have more this scenario.
Thanks,
I have the same issue but know fixed because I forgot to change rp_filter value. Thanks
Hello
Sorry I could not follow your request. What does it mean "make static route manually off" ? On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 at 03:32, optimuscream notifications@github.com wrote:
I have the same issue . FNM can capture the flow if I make static route manually off all the network I want to capture listed in /etc/networks_list. But I suspect it's not the way supposed to work like this . I'm still searching the root cause of this issue.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pavel-odintsov/fastnetmon/issues/645#issuecomment-294656123, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACnfZpFumQlEf2irL190vPRKWz6YDxJ1ks5rxCChgaJpZM4MuvhK .
-- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
I delete the comment after I found that I forget to set rp_filter to 0 . Yes .. I have to set static route for each subnet listed on /etc/networks_list to the correspond gateway interface to make it work. Weird but work but not the ideal solution. I'm using samplicator from https://github.com/sleinen/samplicator because I also using this box as a netflow analyzer. I have to redirect the flow to two different port on the same unit with each have it's own program to handle, which is nfsen and FNM. I thougth samplicator was the culprit, but now it works even I redirect the flow traffic to loopback interface. Great apps (y).
Welcome :)
Hi.
I've installed Fastnetmon 1.1.3 in a virtual machine with Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS, installed in a Xen. Using Netflow monitoring.
I read menu recommendations and tried some issues but the result is the same.
My conf file is attached fastnetmon.conf.txt
My log is attached fastnetmon.log.txt
Iptables output
rp_filter
tcpdump