pavor84 / factplusplus

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/factplusplus
0 stars 0 forks source link

Crash when getting the individuals of a description #12

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am experiencing a crash when getting the individuals of an OWLDescription
that is a intersection of a class and a OneOf.

The error message when it crashes is:
java: tSaveStack.h:50: T* TSaveStack<T>::pop(unsigned int) [with T =
DlCompletionGraph::SaveState]: Assertion `this->last >= depth' failed.

Attached is a test case. Look at the code there are some comments that
describe what I am seeing, including a case in which there is no crash, but
the result is incorrect (I thought it might be related). Below is the stack
trace from the crash.

#0  0x00002b7a42822cab in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x00002b7a42824660 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x00002b7a4281c436 in __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x00002aaaf2afb758 in TSaveStack<DlCompletionGraph::SaveState>::pop
(this=0x2aaaf43a2300, depth=1) at tSaveStack.h:50
#4  0x00002aaaf2afa0e9 in DlCompletionGraph::restore (this=0x2aaaf43a2280,
level=1) at dlCompletionGraph.cpp:163
#5  0x00002aaaf2ac438c in DlSatTester::restore (this=0x2aaaf43a2240,
newTryLevel=1) at Reasoner.cpp:705
#6  0x00002aaaf2ac444c in DlSatTester::reInit (this=0x2aaaf43a2240) at
Reasoner.cpp:86
#7  0x00002aaaf2abf4b6 in DlSatTester::runSat (this=0x2aaaf43a2240, p=517,
q=-540) at Reasoner.h:782
#8  0x00002aaaf2ab4b33 in TBox::isSubHolds (this=0x2aaaf4323bb0,
pConcept=0x2aaaf43a9e80, qConcept=0x2aaaf4362220) at dlTBox.cpp:164
#9  0x00002aaaf2aecffc in DLConceptTaxonomy::testSub (this=0x2aaaf437d610,
p=0x2aaaf43a9e80, q=0x2aaaf4362220) at DLConceptTaxonomy.cpp:81
#10 0x00002aaaf2aed0a8 in DLConceptTaxonomy::testSubsumption
(this=0x2aaaf437d610, upDirection=true, cur=0x2aaaf4359e60) at
DLConceptTaxonomy.cpp:165
#11 0x00002aaaf2aed1fb in DLConceptTaxonomy::enhancedSubs
(this=0x2aaaf437d610, upDirection=true, cur=0x2aaaf4359e60) at
DLConceptTaxonomy.cpp:158
#12 0x00002aaaf2aed264 in DLConceptTaxonomy::searchBaader
(this=0x2aaaf437d610, upDirection=true, cur=0x2aaaf437d6e0) at
DLConceptTaxonomy.cpp:124
#13 0x00002aaaf2a9b97a in DLConceptTaxonomy::runBottomUp
(this=0x2aaaf437d610) at DLConceptTaxonomy.h:113
#14 0x00002aaaf2add33b in Taxonomy::generalTwoPhaseClassification
(this=0x2aaaf437d610) at Taxonomy.cpp:122
#15 0x00002aaaf2addbcf in Taxonomy::performClassification
(this=0x2aaaf437d610, p=0x2aaaf4362220) at Taxonomy.cpp:76
#16 0x00002aaaf2ade56d in Taxonomy::doClassification (this=0x2aaaf437d610,
p=0x2aaaf4362220) at Taxonomy.h:134
#17 0x00002aaaf2addc8f in Taxonomy::classifyTop (this=0x2aaaf437d610) at
Taxonomy.cpp:327
#18 0x00002aaaf2adde50 in Taxonomy::classifyEntry (this=0x2aaaf437d610,
p=0x2aaaf4362220) at Taxonomy.cpp:258
#19 0x00002aaaf2ab3d81 in TBox::classifyTempConcept (this=0x2aaaf4323bb0)
at dlTBox.cpp:275
#20 0x00002aaaf2adfff4 in ReasoningKernel::setUpCache (this=0x2aaaf4246310,
query=0x2aaaf4362750, level=ReasoningKernel::csClassified) at Kernel.cpp:188
#21 0x00002aaaf2aa8f05 in
ReasoningKernel::getDescendants<JTaxonomyActor<IndividualPolicy> >
(this=0x2aaaf4246310, C=0x2aaaf4362750, actor=@0x40229a80) at
../Kernel/Kernel.h:547
#22 0x00002aaaf2aa8f5e in
ReasoningKernel::getInstances<JTaxonomyActor<IndividualPolicy> >
(this=0x2aaaf4246310, C=0x2aaaf4362750, actor=@0x40229a80) at
../Kernel/Kernel.h:647
#23 0x00002aaaf2a875f9 in
Java_uk_ac_manchester_cs_factplusplus_FaCTPlusPlus_askInstances
(env=0x40114590, obj=0x40229b90, arg=0x40229b88) at FaCTPlusPlus.cpp:1637

Original issue reported on code.google.com by arthur.peters on 18 Apr 2008 at 9:55

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am experiencing another crash that may or may not be related to this one. 
They both
only occur in the presence of ObjectOneOf restrictions. However this crash is
non-deterministic. I can predictably make it happen by repeatedly running a 
function
that creates classes that are equivalent to an ObjectOneOf restriction.

I have attached the trace that the JVM produces.

I have not been able to replicate the problem outside my large codebase, so at 
least
for now there is no minimal test case.

Original comment by arthur.peters on 25 Apr 2008 at 4:58

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Fixed in the latest SVN

Original comment by dmitry.t...@gmail.com on 11 Nov 2008 at 4:00