Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
since you are on windows 7, i would guess that you are using ntfs for your usb,
yes?
if so, format the flash drive using "disk->format"
this should format the usb to ext3.
this should increase performace on your device by alot
downside to this, is that ext3 is only supported through 3rd party software on
windows.
you can still use ftp or web to access it though.
i tested it myself on ftp transfer speed,
using ntfs my max transfer speed is only ~600KB/s (with nothing, except ftp
running)
by using ext3, my transfer speed reaches, 7MB/s, which is actually my maximum
wifi transfer speed, between 2 pc.
second, try using 2 disk, 1 for dedicated swap(and chroot if you use it)
the other purely for data.
i find that, while running ftp transfer,ssh,torrent,etc... on ONLY 1 flash,
the web got abit slow.
if not, try to eleborate more on your setting and software.
like, you ftp client, browser, router, transmission setting,and so on.
Original comment by milkboy...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2011 at 4:06
The usb is exfat (I've tried also ext2 and ext3). The top speed improves
radically with ext3 but the normal transfer speed is normally stuck at 7 to 10
KB/s. I reached 3-4 MB/s with the previous firmware. If I reboot the NAS, the
speed goes up to 2-3 MB/s that is more than acceptable for me but only lasts
for a couple of hours or without transmission running. The transfer is made
over a wifi 802.11N network and I had no problems with the speed before. I
really think it's a memory problem...
Original comment by paulv...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2011 at 4:52
[deleted comment]
i know what you mean. i myself need to reboot snake os daily.
snake os does have some memory limitation problem.
the current patch is the swap file method, sadly.
and i find it practically useless on speeding up the system
its only use is to keep trasnmission running T.T
however, if you are good with hardware,
there is a an experimental ram upgrade being done.
and i'll only recommend it if you are good with hardware.
http://code.google.com/p/snake-os/issues/detail?id=69&q=memory
development seems to have stalled thou.
almost forgot,did you install any heatsink?
cause couple of hours seems to correspond my old problem, before adding
heatsink.
now with the heatsink mine last for atleast a day befor any general slow down.
other than that anyone else care to try?
Original comment by milkboy...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2011 at 9:51
I suppose I don't have the necessary skills to upgrade the ram.
The nas doesn't seem to be too hot anyway.
Is it possible to downgrade to the older firmware? (I've never tried that and I
don't want to brick my nas).
Original comment by paulv...@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2011 at 6:20
yes downgrading is possible.
http://groups.google.com/group/dealextreme-nas-/browse_thread/thread/d70f2e90736
19602/123db1526dd8a51b?lnk=gst&q=DOWNGRADE#123db1526dd8a51b
gist of it is yes.
in fact, it seems some members are able to use
snakeos-V1.2.0-20100621-*from-original*.bin, instead of *from-snake*, to
downgrade.
just to be safe i would recommend from *from-snake*
procedure should be the same as upgrading
Original comment by milkboy...@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2011 at 8:12
Yeah, downgreding should be safe.
I really need to check if the transmission settings can be tweaked a bit to
reduce memory usage.
Original comment by stefansc...@googlemail.com
on 16 Nov 2011 at 12:24
Maybe an older version of transmission used less memory?
Is it possible to produce a package of an older version if it fixes the memory
usage problem. I feel the other problems with older version were much less
important than this memory problem.
Original comment by paulv...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2011 at 11:02
Probably. The one that comes with 1.3.2-20101130 works better?
Original comment by stefansc...@googlemail.com
on 16 Nov 2011 at 12:30
It worked better when I tried it with the older firmware. How can I test it
with the new firmware?
Original comment by paulv...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2011 at 12:50
It's a bit messy but if you didn't uninstall transmission before downgrading
you could try to transplant the old transmission into the package installation
then upgrade to the latest snake os again.
To do this ssh into the old snake and do
rm -r /usb/sda1/.optware/share/transmission/
cp -a /usr/share/transmission/ /usb/sda1/.optware/share/
cp /usr/share/transmission/bin/transmission-daemon /usb/sda1/.optware/bin/
Then install the latest snake. If you enable opkg it should launch the old
transmission.
It would probably be easier to just package up the old transmission.
Original comment by stefansc...@googlemail.com
on 16 Nov 2011 at 2:41
I did all you said. Now it seems to be much better than before. I've problems
with some torrents as I had in the previous versions but the memory problem
seems fixed.
I don't know how to package an .opk. Anyway here it is the zipped .optware
folder.
Original comment by paulv...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2011 at 6:33
Attachments:
ok thanks.. here's that version in packaged up:
http://code.google.com/p/snake-os/downloads/detail?name=transmission-2.12-1.opk
I did a bit a testing and downloading a few large torrents really seems to slow
things down to a crawl.
I get the feeling that it's not the memory usage (I still had about 10mb free
most of the time) but the way newer versions access the disk that causes these
slowdowns. Maybe setting a speed cap would help or limiting the number of peers.
(I also had the network driver crap out twice but that seems to be a different
issue)
Original comment by stefansc...@googlemail.com
on 17 Nov 2011 at 6:30
[deleted comment]
I really don't know what's the problem with the new version. I've tried to
limit the peers, the speed and also the number of torrents to a minimum, but
still it didn't work for a long time. Now it seems stable. It's fast and
stable. It still has problem when adding torrents with long or strange names.
Original comment by paulv...@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2011 at 8:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
paulv...@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2011 at 6:00