Closed kayvonghaffari closed 9 years ago
Currently, we use it { is_expected.to include stub_response }. This doesn't work for responses that return arrays of hashes. For example:
it { is_expected.to include stub_response }
response: page_count: 1 transfers: - &valid_transfer_response token: DXR1bkh1PS80g amount_cents: 100 is_deposit: true created_at: "2015-02-22T00:00:00+00:00" updated_at: "2015-02-22T00:00:00+00:00" state: cleared effective_balance: 100 - &valid_transfer_scheduled_response <<: *valid_transfer_response state: scheduled - &valid_transfer_pending_response <<: *valid_transfer_response state: pending - &valid_transfer_cleared_response <<: *valid_transfer_response state: cleared - &valid_transfer_failed_response <<: *valid_transfer_response state: failed
The transfers array would be checked for an exact match with the service response when the intended behavior is just inclusion within the underlying transfer hashses
transfers
Currently, we use
it { is_expected.to include stub_response }
. This doesn't work for responses that return arrays of hashes. For example:The
transfers
array would be checked for an exact match with the service response when the intended behavior is just inclusion within the underlying transfer hashses