Closed navidcy closed 3 years ago
Is it time to let go of shortpath
?
I could have sworn we'd had a discussion about this already, but if we had it isn't in the issues or PRs.
I think the argument was that there were a lot of legacy configs that already use shortpath
, and that it could potentially be just as confusing adding scratchpath
as leaving it as-is.
That’s why I suggested a synonym, ie both should work. Feel free to close the issue if discussion was made : )
or maybe a neutral synonym like outputpath
that's independent of whatever NCI decide to call their scratch space? Who knows what it will be called in the next machine...
@aekiss looks ahead in the future.
In a way shortpath
is already machine agnostic, as there is no longer a /short
filesystem ... the argument against change is confusion. It sort of doesn't matter what you choose as your new name, it will still be confusing that there are now two names for the same thing, but not sure I'm a fan of outputpath
. We already have output000
directories, and the laboratory
contains more than just outputs.
labprefix
is possibly the most accurate, but isn't intuitive.
I'm happy to keep shortpath
, with no synonyms. I haven't heard of anyone being confused by it, whereas 2 names for the same thing is bound to cause confusion.
Let’s keep it. It’s OK :) Sorry for creating noise. We have much more pressing things we can deal with, eg, climate change?
shortpath
is deprecated with new gadi machine. Perhaps change it toscratchpath
or make a synonym to retain backwards compatibility?