Closed marshallward closed 3 years ago
Do we want to add a test to make sure this is picked up in case it gets accidentally removed/changed?
Do you mean just adding a test case with an empty YAML file? Yeah, I can add that.
But you may mean something more significant, which I am missing.
Yeah I meant an empty yaml test. I don't think it is super important, but it is a good habit to get into to add to the tests when a bug is fixed.
I noticed this was still open, do you still feel like adding an empty yaml file test case @marshallward?
Seems I cannot even remember how to run the tests (or perhaps they have changed). This may need a chat.
@marshallward I added a test for an empty config, and found to my surprise it isn't empty because of that auto translation of the old collate
boolean to a dict
.
Are you happy with this behaviour, or do you want some special case logic around this
https://github.com/payu-org/payu/blob/master/payu/fsops.py#L72-L91
Sorry, had to rebase and force push for tests to be consistent with current code base.
All good with me!
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:21 AM Coveralls @.***> wrote:
[image: Coverage Status] https://coveralls.io/builds/38323652
Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 42.186% when pulling e2575c2 https://github.com/payu-org/payu/commit/e2575c260702650304c400a53f1fd305ac66c69b on empty_config into f3f99e7 https://github.com/payu-org/payu/commit/f3f99e71198d104c0208fd74ad1690afdf21c2de on master.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/payu-org/payu/pull/252#issuecomment-809074019, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADQ32YEXTGZH2XJ4UZ7O5TTGAE5RANCNFSM4MXL2XJQ .
If one passes an empty YAML file, e.g. all lines commented out, then PyYAML returns
None
, which breaks subsequent assumptions in the handling of config.We now parse an empty file as an empty dict, {}.