Closed TomasTomecek closed 8 years ago
done. thanks for the link!
Sweet, thank you!
If you could provide a new release with the license, that would be awesome.
OK, but it will take a few days.
no worries, take your time
actually, there always was urwidtrees.__license__
set to GPL3...
But without license text it doesn't mean anything.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text second paragraph
Sorry about the confusion, my point with this issue was to add license text (yes, license is set correctly to GPLv3+).
I would like to package this for Arch Linux and would also ideally have a new tagged release. Is there anything I can do to help push this through ASAP?
I just noticed that there's a release on PyPI for version 1.0.1.1, but there doesn't appear to be a matching tag in the git repository, and judging by the release date, my guess is it doesn't include a license file.
@djmattyg007 https://github.com/pazz/urwidtrees/issues/24#issuecomment-168972270
The way I went with this in Fedora is that I used git snapshot with license and stored git commit in build id: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=738505
The Arch User Repository allows git packages, but I'm hoping to avoid going down that road. I'm not going to wait around forever though.
sorry @TomasTomecek , I meant to push this ages ago and forgot. I cleaned up a bit and tagged/pushed version 1.0.2, which includes a LICENCE file. I do not maintain the PIP version, and accordingly, removed the link in the README.
Awesome! Thank you very much!
I'm trying to package urwidtrees to Fedora and just realized that license is not available. Would it be possible to add it? Can provide patch.
https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/