codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 99.63%. Comparing base (
49a2921) to head (839af44). Report is 20 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #322 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 99.63% 99.63% ======================================= Files 164 164 Lines 16586 16627 +41 ======================================= + Hits 16526 16567 +41 Misses 55 55 Partials 5 5 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pb33f/libopenapi/pull/322/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pb33f) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pb33f/libopenapi/pull/322/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pb33f) | `99.63% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pb33f#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Instead of using "root.yaml" as a theoretical root, use the real filename of the root spec (often openapi.yaml). This fixes issues with resolving references in rules such as unused-components.