Closed skoushan closed 6 years ago
It doesn't matter if your device is USB 3.0 if the flash memory inside is slow. Alas, it's not at all uncommon for cheap USB 3.0 device to use flash that can only write at 10 MB/s, in which case you are going to find that applying a Windows image can be excruciatingly slow.
Unless your device can sustain 60 MB/s write speed (be mindful that a USB 3.0 device might be rated 100MB/s read speed, but still have a 10 MB/s write speed or less), you should consider using a different device for Windows To Go, as you will only be disappointed by both the speed at which you can create the Windows To Go drive, and the speed at which it operates.
Also, because Windows is basically using the Windows APIs to apply an image, which means that it's a complete black box, there's literally nothing we can do to speed up things, as Microsoft are the only ones who control what's going on behind the scenes here.
For the record, with a USB 3.0 flash drive that has a 70 MB/s write speed, creating a Windows To Go drive takes less than 15 mins.
Got it, thanks. Will try with a different stick and re-open if it's still problematic.
Tried it with a SanDisk CZ80; done after about 30 minutes. Thanks for building such a great tool!
Alrighty then. Of course, creation times may also vary depending on the image you use (I think more recent Windows 10 images are slower than the earlier Windows 10 ISOs), but 30 mins sounds about right, and should leave you with a Windows To Drive that is actually usable. 😃
Thanks for following up on this issue and posting an update!
Just a thought based on my experience...
I'm not sure if this applies to your specific system but, i recall that the speed on my USB 3.0 port had dramatically improved in R/W speed by updating the Drivers from the Chipset Manufacturer and not the Motherboard/PCI-E Card Manufacturer because, in my case, the Motherboard/PCI-E Manufacturers drivers were fine but, the Manufacturer for the Chipset was so much newer and performed so much better.
In addition to this, I've also found that on Windows 8.1/10, the Windows Indexer always has been affecting this and other areas of the R/W for drives (including this USB Process in question).
At times I've had to go and end the Indexing Process to noticeably increase the speed for writing to an external drive.
Just my thoughts that I hope is helpful to you! :-)
~Ibuprophen
That's good to know. For the record, recent version of Rufus do disable drive indexing when formatting the partition, which should hopefully keep Windows away from trying to poke around the files being copied over. But then again, Rufus also holds an exclusive lock on the partition while writing files to it, which, even with indexing enabled, should keep Windows at bay. But of course, one can never tell when Microsoft might have decided to have Windows ignore rules, that applications try to set to keep it at bay...
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue if you think you have a related problem or query.
Checklist
<FULL LOG>
below.Rufus version: x.y.z
- I have NOT removed any part of it.Additionally (if applicable):
(✓)
button to compute the MD5, SHA1 and SHA256 checksums, which are therefore present in the log I copied. I confirmed, by performing an internet search, that these values match the ones from the official image.Issue description
Trying to create a WIndows To GO USB for Windows 10 Pro. The "Applying Windows image" step is taking approximately 10 minutes per 0.1% (i.e. it's going to take a week at this rate). From the log, it's mostly taking time to extract small files like PNG's, though CPU usage from Rufus is below 1%. My device is USB 3.0 (and Rufus recognized that). What could be the problem here?
Log