Sufia+PCDM Roadmap - Githubissues

pbinkley / HC2015-program

Planning for Hydra Connect 2015

0 stars 0 forks source link

Sufia+PCDM Roadmap #69

Open mark-dce opened 9 years ago

mark-dce commented 9 years ago

Presenter: Mike Giarlo (Mark e/m 6/26; Jon Stroop Format: presentation (preping working group #11)

hackartisan commented 9 years ago

general-interest version of #62

mark-dce commented 9 years ago

Mark to talk with Jeremy about making #62 developer focused with #69 a general audience teaser for plenary

mark-dce commented 9 years ago

I talked with Mike G. and confirmed that he's willing to act as lead presenter (possibly with other's helping)

mjgiarlo commented 9 years ago

@mark-dce @richardGreen

Hmmm, I thought I confirmed my availability and interest for this -- at least I don't see any outstanding email in my inbox about it. I was the presenter in mind for this right? If so, consider me confirmed to deliver this plenary talk.

There were a number of slots about Sufia and the PCDM. If this is the talk that will partly cover ongoing work about PCDM and Sufia, I believe @jpstroop offered to co-present.

jpstroop commented 9 years ago

Yeah, if 'e/m' means email and I was supposed to receive one, I don't think I have. I'm happy to help on this one, if you'd like. Either that or I'd suggest making this only about PCDM, and then move of the discussion about sufia/curation_concens etc. over to #11--I don't think that's a good idea, however, as this topic seems to be of interest to most of the community.

mjgiarlo commented 9 years ago

@jpstroop I sense that you're leaning towards the following:

Cancel #11
Go forward with you and me co-presenting #69 and focusing on
- Brief background info re: Sufia, Worthwhile, and PCDM to provide context to the audience
- The state of PCDM dev in Hydra (the May & summer sprints, the new gem stack)
- What's coming next (when will things be "done"?) and how can folks get involved

That's what I have in mind, too. How does that sound? I suspect we can squeeze that into 20 minutes, though 25 or 30 would be better, @richardGreen @mark-dce etc. :wink:

jpstroop commented 9 years ago

:+1: I agree. I think that as long as we don't dally on PCDM for too long (which probably isn't appropriate anyway), we should be able to make it fit.

mjgiarlo commented 9 years ago

:+1: Limit that to a 30-second description and hand-wave in the direction of all the other PCDM program entries. (I am also dreaming here of a snazzy, simple page like iiif.io but targeted at getting folks from 0 to 60 (well, maybe 30 :wink:) on PCDM -- that way we can say, "just look at pcdm.io!" -- but I doubt any of us has time for such a thing.)

:cool: Thanks, @jpstroop