Probably use Joe Watson's censored Poisson approach (for HBLL too). It's working well in sdmTMB now.
There may be issues with the current baited hook proportions. Notes from @jdunic:
the gfiphc data accounts for chum only observed counts, but the raw data doesn't seem to include this information. And so in 2012, I think that is what explains the difference observed hook counts of about 100 - 200 hooks.
I also see some big differences at 47 stations in 2006, where the gfiphc hook counts seem to have about 100 more hooks observed than the raw data. Other differences are <10. Except for a weird difference of 700 in 2018. These differences occur at stations that have a Y Eff code so I don't think they were filtered out in dogfish?
Consider just using what @jdunic creates for the synopsis report.
Consider just using what @jdunic creates for the synopsis report.