Open andrew-edwards opened 6 years ago
Hm, I didn’t know that – see – we need a document with all of these useful bits!
From: andrew-edwards [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 3:51 PM To: pbs-assess/gfplot Cc: Subscribed Subject: [pbs-assess/gfplot] Check usability codes for IPHC data are the same as other surveys (#35)
I think they are different, and will check (think I have some notes) and document somewhere.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/pbs-assess/gfplot/issues/35, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcE2EW3UV5vbdmQYiJkkGvUm3-VBMgEZks5ucspDgaJpZM4WxGYp.
Ideally this document will describe many of those idiosyncrasies, but I’m sure there are all sorts of idiosyncrasies left uncovered.
If the usability codes are different then we should probably use a unique argument in the get data function since all the functions are documented together. Something like usability_iphc. And maybe list what they mean in the documentation.
select(
d, species_common_name, survey_abbrev, year,
biomass, lowerci, upperci, mean_cv,
num_sets, num_pos_sets
)
Above is the output form of tidy_survey_index
which then gets called by plot_survey_index
.
Andy to get the IPHC series into that format.
I think they are different, and will check (think I have some notes) and document somewhere.