Open quang-huynh opened 2 years ago
Which document are you looking at? i.e. which doc is where "Tech doc equation 11" is from? Can you put a link here..
It's in iSCAMTechDoc.pdf
OK, where are you getting this equation from: -(A-1) * T * log(tau) - 0.5 * sum(eta^2)/tau^2
That's equation L.9 in Table 3 of Richards and Schnute (1995), after taking the log
I'm having a hard time getting what you have from Eq 9, I get this after logging it:
-T * log(sqrt(2pi) * tau) + T/2 * log(A) - (1/(2 * tau ^2) + sum(sum(eta ^ 2))
So log(A)
would have to be equal to log(sqrt(2pi) * tau)
to subtract the T's in the first two terms, am I missing something?
I have -T * (A-1) * [log(sqrt(2pi)) + log(tau)]
for the first term.
Both log(sqrt(2pi))
and T/2 * log(A)
can be dropped since they are constants
The ADMB source code is completely undocumented and convoluted, and every time I look at it I feel a little sick.
I think it could be this: https://github.com/admb-project/admb/blob/baf480ffe84bc8c1054a3334d15a9885d0bceed1/contrib/statslib/dmultinom.cpp#L50
I think that's the link to the multinomial likelihood. I see the dmvlogistic
call in iscam.tpl for the multivariate logistic likelihood.
Looks like dmvlogistic is also distributed in ADMB: https://github.com/admb-project/admb/blob/main/contrib/statslib/dmvlogistic.cpp
I was working through the derivation of Tech Doc equation 11, which seems to be missing a 0.5 term.
If the log-likelihood is
-(A-1) * T * log(tau) - 0.5 * sum(eta^2)/tau^2
, then substitution of the equation just above no. 11 should result in-0.5 * (A - 1) * T * log(tau^2) + constant
sincelog(tau) = 0.5 * log(tau^2)
. Schnute and Richards (1995) also seem to be missing this 0.5 term in Table 4, L14, but the derivation is analogous to Appendix D of the ADMB manual which does have this 0.5 term.Does the ADMB code have the 0.5 in the likelihood?